Exploring the Relationship Between Conception of Language Learning and Foreign Language Learning Burnout: An Empirical Study Among University Students

Exploring the Relationship Between Conception of Language Learning and Foreign Language Learning Burnout: An Empirical Study Among University Students

Minghui Yang, Yuhui Zhai
DOI: 10.4018/IJCINI.309133
Article PDF Download
Open access articles are freely available for download

Abstract

This study explores the relationship between college students’ conception of language learning and foreign language learning burnout and tries to solve the following problems: How does learners’ conception of language learning affect their English learning burnout? How to relieve English learning burnout? Data were collected through two questionnaires, English learning burnout and conception of language learning, among 363 non-English majors in two universities in central part of China. The findings provide empirical evidence linking college students’ conception of language learning with their English learning burnout: “Testing” is the key factor that leading to burnout in English learning, which positively predicts “Exhaustion”, “Apathy” and “Reduced self-efficacy”; “Memorizing” positively influences “Reduced Self-efficacy” and negatively predicts “Apathy”; “Language knowledge” negatively predicts “Exhaustion” and “Understanding and Seeing in a new way” negatively predicts “Apathy”.
Article Preview
Top

Background

Foreign Language Learning Burnout

Burnout was first proposed by psychologist Freudenberg (1974) to describe pressures in the working environment characterized by extreme exhaustion, indifference, and effortlessness. According to Pines & Aronson (1988), learning burnout is the negative performance of learning, such as low enthusiasm and indifference when faced with long-term learning pressures. More scholars have tried to define the concept of learning burnout from different perspectives (Neumann et al., 1990). In fact, the measurement of learning burnout had been established by many scholars. Among them, the Maslach and Jackson (1981) burnout inventory’s three-category division is the most adopted: (1) emotional exhaustion; (2) depersonalization; and (3) lack of personal accomplishment. To find a more suitable scale for foreign language learning burnout, the foreign language learning burnout inventory, coined by Yang (2010), was adopted. Yang (2010) then divided foreign language learning burnout into three additional types: (1) emotional exhaustion; (2) apathy; and (3) reduced self-efficacy.

Scholars have studied learning burnout through influencing factors, adverse effects, and effective interventions. Influencing factors include self-efficacy, self-esteem, and stress (Charkhabi et al., 2013; Rasheed-Karim, 2020; Sovitriana et al., 2019). Negative effects of learning burnout can impact a student’s negative psychology, mental health, academic performance, and interpersonal relationships. It can even include substance abuse and the increased possibility of suicidal thoughts (Jackson et al., 2016). The gamified approach is proven effective in alleviating students’ learning burnout and improving learning achievement (Mu & Guo, 2022).

Complete Article List

Search this Journal:
Reset
Volume 18: 1 Issue (2024)
Volume 17: 1 Issue (2023)
Volume 16: 1 Issue (2022)
Volume 15: 4 Issues (2021)
Volume 14: 4 Issues (2020)
Volume 13: 4 Issues (2019)
Volume 12: 4 Issues (2018)
Volume 11: 4 Issues (2017)
Volume 10: 4 Issues (2016)
Volume 9: 4 Issues (2015)
Volume 8: 4 Issues (2014)
Volume 7: 4 Issues (2013)
Volume 6: 4 Issues (2012)
Volume 5: 4 Issues (2011)
Volume 4: 4 Issues (2010)
Volume 3: 4 Issues (2009)
Volume 2: 4 Issues (2008)
Volume 1: 4 Issues (2007)
View Complete Journal Contents Listing