Institutional Ethnography and Exploring the Social: A Sociological Approach of Actors' Perspectives

Institutional Ethnography and Exploring the Social: A Sociological Approach of Actors' Perspectives

Copyright: © 2021 |Pages: 22
DOI: 10.4018/IJSKD.2021100108
OnDemand:
(Individual Articles)
Available
$37.50
No Current Special Offers
TOTAL SAVINGS: $37.50

Abstract

There is a new trend taking place in Egypt over the last decades that is attempting to establish a new culture of development arguing for a knowledge-based development of Egyptian society. Consequently, Egyptian society has begun to witness the emergence of different policies, national strategies, and mega development projects that try to translate these policies into reality. But the question that remains is what type of knowledge, and in which context, should be developed? In this vein, this research serves two purposes. First, it contests the notion of knowledge while using a new method of inquiry that creates an opening for an alternative-more-humanized sociology that opposes the dominant sociological perspective that studies people as quantitative objects. The research uses institutional ethnography to provide new-actor-related insights and interpretations while exploring the social momentum within Egyptian society. Second, the research seeks to investigate the relationship between the desire to transform Egypt into a knowledge-based society through the knowledge precincts projects, following the global agenda, and the creation of a political, social, and cultural environment that allows knowledge to thrive, leading to more social justice and equity. In the end, the research asks: What is the definition of ‘knowledge' provided by the Egyptian government through its different developmental policies? How does it function inside the knowledge precincts projects? It also asks: Does Egypt's commitment to large scale programs through knowledge precincts reveal an authoritarian inclination?
Article Preview
Top

1. Introduction

Since the early 1990s, Egypt has shown a strong commitment to global discourse 1 following the global agenda in applying new evolutionary development strategies known as Knowledge-based Urban Development (KBUD), where new policies were issued and new projects of Knowledge Precincts (KPs) were built to fulfill these policies. In theory, it is argued that the concept of Knowledge-based Urban Development (KBUD) has emerged as a new scientific movement, as a result of the growing role of ‘knowledge’ in contemporary human societies. KBUD has established itself as a theoretical and applied approach, a development policy, and a planning strategy that aspires to achieve development through four main dimensions: economical, socio-cultural, environmental, and institutional. This could be achieved through the creation of different spaces for the production of knowledge itself within the community. Such a case can only happen through the potential provided by the Communication and Information Technology (ICT), which facilitate the production of knowledge and its sustainable employment through different specialized projects of Knowledge Precincts (KPs). Potentially, the KPs projects depend on a fully equipped ICT infrastructure along with an empowered and creative human capital (Abdrabo, 2018).

In the field of Sociology, many studies have shown that implementing KBUD policies, while achieving social justice, cannot be considered as an easy or fast process as it cannot happen solely through the efforts of an interventionist state. It requires real support from all social agents: local government, citizens, civil society, NGOs, active universities, strong research centers, and powerful activists. Such process aspires to create a Knowledge Society which cannot be defined as a society based only on knowledge sharing since it is about the capability to identify, process, transform, disseminate, and use information to build and apply knowledge for human development. It requires the empowering of a holistic social vision that encompasses plurality, inclusion, solidarity, and participation amongst its people (Popper, 2013: 26-27; Taleb, 2007: xx-xxii). In this vein, the research followed an ethnographic empirical approach gathering primary data from the field within three cases of study through in-depth interviews with experts working in three Egyptian Knowledge Precincts (KPs): (1) The Information Technology Institute (ITI), founded in 1993; (2) The City of Scientific Research and Technological Applications in Burg Al-Arab (SRTA-City), founded in 1993 (institutional decision and on the 13th of August 2000 started working; (3) the final case is Smart Village (SV), founded in November 2001.

Complete Article List

Search this Journal:
Reset
Volume 16: 1 Issue (2024)
Volume 15: 1 Issue (2023)
Volume 14: 4 Issues (2022): 2 Released, 2 Forthcoming
Volume 13: 4 Issues (2021)
Volume 12: 4 Issues (2020)
Volume 11: 4 Issues (2019)
Volume 10: 4 Issues (2018)
Volume 9: 4 Issues (2017)
Volume 8: 4 Issues (2016)
Volume 7: 4 Issues (2015)
Volume 6: 4 Issues (2014)
Volume 5: 4 Issues (2013)
Volume 4: 4 Issues (2012)
Volume 3: 4 Issues (2011)
Volume 2: 4 Issues (2010)
Volume 1: 4 Issues (2009)
View Complete Journal Contents Listing