Estimating Latent Growth Curve Models: An Introduction

Estimating Latent Growth Curve Models: An Introduction

K. A. S. Wickrama
DOI: 10.4018/978-1-6684-6859-3.ch013
OnDemand:
(Individual Chapters)
Available
$37.50
No Current Special Offers
TOTAL SAVINGS: $37.50

Abstract

Although LGC modeling is gaining popularity in some disciplines, it has not been widely employed in social-epidemiological studies. This paper presents an introduction to the latent growth curve (LGC) technique within a structural equation modelling (SEM) framework as a powerful tool to analyze change in individual attributes over time (e.g., behaviors, attitudes, beliefs, and health) and potential correlates of such changes. The rationale for LGC analysis and subsequent elaboration of this statistical approach are discussed. For illustrations, Mplus (version 8, Muthén & Muthén, 2012) software and depressive symptoms as the individual outcomes attribute are used. The limitations of traditional analytical methods are also addressed. Particularly, the chapter considers socio-contextual factors as correlates of change in the outcomes variable, and examines the dynamic systematic relationship with the socioeconomic factors (however, these correlates can also be factors other than social-context).
Chapter Preview
Top

The Need To Investigate Different Growth Parameters

Change entails different facets. Individual-specific growth parameters can capture different facets of change. These parameters include not only the intensity or severity (level) and but also the amount of growth or decline (rate of change or slope) in an outcome over time. Traditional methods are not sensitive enough to capture this difference and to distinguish the difference between these two courses of development, although these courses may have different sequelae and also different antecedents (Willet & Sawyer, 1994; Wickrama et al., 2016). For example, development of depressive disorder may not simply correspond to the severe end of a continuum of depressive symptoms. ‘The causal structure for initiation, prolongation, and exacerbation (of prodromal build-up of symptoms) are not well understood’ (Eaton et al., 1995). The lack of focus on within-individual changes could result in incomplete and/or potentially inaccurate conclusions concerning changes in psychosocial, behavioral or health attributes, but also their antecedents and sequelae (Wickrama et al., 2003; 2016). Since growth curve analysis explicitly estimates within-individual changes with multiple facets and their inter-individual variations and then examine potential correlates of change, it addresses most of the limitations of traditional analytical approaches.

Complete Chapter List

Search this Book:
Reset