Exploring Human Identity From Social, Cultural, Philosophical, and Biopolitical Perspectives: Free v Confined I

Exploring Human Identity From Social, Cultural, Philosophical, and Biopolitical Perspectives: Free v Confined I

Copyright: © 2023 |Pages: 18
DOI: 10.4018/978-1-6684-4808-3.ch013
OnDemand:
(Individual Chapters)
Available
$37.50
No Current Special Offers
TOTAL SAVINGS: $37.50

Abstract

The author travels across the human identity regions, including the social, cultural, philosophical, and biopolitical. First, the author meets the concept of social identity and how it influences an individual's self-concept and body-image. Then a few strokes of the historical and cultural context of human identity, highlighting how technological progress and social structures shape our understanding of identity. By the same token, the author also touches on the ethical dilemmas that may arise from merging body and information technologies, including the possibility of widening income inequality and genetic editing. The philosophical grounds of human identity are then examined, with a focus on the narrative nature of selfhood and the significance of personal identity in bioethics. Finally, the author assesses the impact of public health and biopolitics on identity, including the creation of fictive ethnicities and the challenges of addressing displacement.
Chapter Preview
Top

Digging For Human Identity In Political And Philosophical Grounds

Social Identity

The social identity is an individual self-concept as a member of a social group that influences how this person thinks, acts, feels as well as her self-view and her body-image (Falvo & Holland, 2017, p. 21). When identity mainly grounds on politics a dichotomous mindset rules and the experience of oppression fades away (Talwar, 2018). The political identities are tricky.

The identity expression is versatile. For example, the soccer chants shift from group-reinforcement to group-threatening when one team or another scores (Scheepers et al., 2003). The discrimination inter-groups responds to a desire for cognitive coherence and a need for positive self-esteem (Abrams & Hogg, 1988). We dislike the self-blurriness coming from a hasty game-changing, we abhor the displacement and intuitively identify it with the melancholy of disbelonging.

In my opinion, the goal of the social sciences is empowering us to deal with our place within a very big picture and spans of time that are subsumed in our daily experience. But for making the social sciences humanly understandable is needed to suppose the existence of “managerial identities” among our many identities that gives cohesion to the set, that look both inwards and outwards (Watson, 2008).

We have overlooked the transformative practices able to change the oppression, masochism and guilt social schemes around the politics of identity (Grossberg, 1996). The architecture and natural surroundings partly determines the identity of a person influencing her self-view, shaping its manifestation (Hauge, 2007). Thus, identity can be shattered due to a displacement. Indeed, the forced migration due to the lack of support to local networks resulting from the global financial stakeholders’ unwillingness to change their role as masters of humankind is paramount over any other identity crash (Rawlinson, 2016, pp. 193–194).

In other words, the modern cravings for control, chiefly over the nature, has led to a social fragmentation that makes the contemporary construction of identity both situational and incongruent since our identity has been reduced to profiles and profilicity (D’Ambrosio, 2018). Therefore, Bodi would also advocate for the right to be forgotten like a fundamental one (Abbasi et al., 2017).

The widening income inequality and the impact on indigenous populations also raises questions about the social and cultural dimensions of human identity. Additionally, the displacement caused by policies and decisions made about our cities and sexuality highlight the role of social structures and power dynamics in shaping our identity. Therefore, we’ll reflect now on the ways in which technological progress, social structures, and cultural traditions shape our understanding of human identity.

Key Terms in this Chapter

Ethical Dilemmas: Complex choices between conflicting options where doing either one is morally required but doing both is impossible.

Marginalisation: Excluding individuals or groups from access to opportunities and services, leading to a lower status.

Cultural Traditions: Passed-down customs, beliefs, and practices that shape a society's art, values, and way of life.

Indigenous Populations: Original inhabitants with earlier historical and cultural ties to a region, often impacted by colonisation.

Alienation: Feeling disconnected and isolated from others or society involving a painful separation between the Self and the others that belong together.

Social Structure: The organised and stable patterns of institutions and relationships that shape how people interact in society.

Human Body: Our physical form blending biology, emotions, experiences and identity, able to connect the tangible and intangible.

Complete Chapter List

Search this Book:
Reset