Feminist Approaches to Global Migration

Feminist Approaches to Global Migration

Karleah Harris, Roseline Jindori Yunusa Vakkia, Gifty Dede Ashirifi, Peter McCarthy, Kieu Ngoc Le
Copyright: © 2022 |Pages: 21
DOI: 10.4018/978-1-6684-4511-2.ch001
OnDemand:
(Individual Chapters)
Available
$37.50
No Current Special Offers
TOTAL SAVINGS: $37.50

Abstract

Women comprise slightly less than half of the total population of immigrants across the world. As advocacy and fight for equal rights, opportunities, and identity for women continue, migration opens doors to global education for immigrant women to obtain personal autonomy, independence, empowerment, and a chance of earning higher wages than what they would have earned in their home countries. On the opposite end, women may also face oppression, gender inequality, and discrimination based on their ethnicity, class, and race through migration. This chapter highlights the rewards and drawbacks experienced by migrant women and feminist theory approaches to global migration. Examining the experience of migrant women using feminist theory underpinnings could potentially lead to deeper understanding and recommendations for international policies as well as evidence-based, culturally competent interventions to assist women migrants.
Chapter Preview
Top

Background

According to Smith and Hamon (2017), feminism is “the search for rights, opportunities, and identities and women believe they deserved” (p. 310). The Seneca Falls Convention started feminism in the United States in 1848, and the right to vote was fought by Susan Anthony and Elizabeth Cady Stanton (Smith & Hamon, 2017). Smith and Hamon (2017) noted that feminist theory is also rooted in the feminist movement. Whereas White, Martin, and Adamson (2019) posited that the feminist theory came from a social movement and provided an understanding of the different variations that existed. White et al. (2019) mentioned that equal rights were the feminist focus during the 19th century, while throughout the 20th- century, attention was given to diverse areas such as female physiology, mothering, female nurturance, and culture of feminist (White et al., 2019). White et al. (2019) discussed that the social movement was divided into two phases by many researchers. Phase one included the recognition of the universal suffrage by many governments from the early 1920s to the 1980s and the early 2020s. The 1930s depression, the war, and the reconstructions in 1940 reflect the women’s movement activities. The second phase was from the 1960s to the 20th century, and the 1960s focused on personal liberation and equality (White et al., 2019). White et al. (2019) posited that there is a third wave today that focuses on women and poststructuralism.

Complete Chapter List

Search this Book:
Reset