The current focus on performance measurement in local levels of government reflects citizen demand for evidence of program effectiveness. Performance measurement enables local officials to hold organizations accountable to introduce consequences for performance. Performance measurement is the one of the main effects of the loss of worker jobs. If the manager's appraisal of the worker's performance is not efficient, they can evaluate that their labour force is unnecessary. A common terminology has emerged over time which allows different elements of performance measurement to the identified: inputs, process, outputs, outcomes. Additionally, in order to set out a standard for comparison of results, this is known as a benchmarking. Line managers can use performance data to inform their resource allocation decisions. All over the world, countries and local units, labour markets are unreliable. The twin pillars of jobs at living wages for all who sought work and income supports for those who found themselves outside of the local labour market were built.
TopEssential features of a framework for performance measurement in local entities should include; the dimensions of performance to be measured, the criteria to be considered in selecting indicator, and the establishment of a balanced set of measures.
Performance measures are quantitative or qualitative assessments over time of what an organization (i.e., local government) is doing, how well it is doing it, and what the effects of its activities are. A common terminology has emerged over time, which allows different elements of performance measurement to be identified. These are (Caiden, l998, p.37):
- •
inputs; refer to the basic resources worked with,
- •
process/activities/workload; concerns how the goods and services are delivered,
- •
outputs; are the goods and services produced,
- •
outcomes; of products of services and goods- reflect the impact on local recipients.
There are also productivity costs, consumer satisfaction and service quality and timeliness measures.
Elements of performance provide the building blocks for the development of performance indicators. There are also of most value when one looks at how they can be used to produce indicators of different dimension of performance (3 Es) (Boyle, 2000, p. 6; Falay, 1997, pp. 18-30):
- •
Economy indicators are primarily concerned with the inputs, and show the cost of requiring goods and services.
- •
Efficiency indicators concern the relationship between output and inputs.
- •
Effectiveness indicators are primarily focused on showing the outcome of the service.
Where levels are specified for any measure, these constitute performance standards. Where reference is made to identifying and implementing best practice in order to set out a standard for comparison of results, this is known as benchmarking. When output is not directly measurable, proxies known as indicators may be used (Fischer, 1994, pp. 3-4, 8-10; Bruder, 1994, pp. 9-14; Keehley et al.1997).