Proving the Science: Opportunity Identification to Research Contract
Carolyn J. Fausnaugh (Florida Institute of Technology, USA) and Mary Helen McCay (Florida Institute of Technology, USA)
Copyright © 2010.
OnDemand Chapter PDF Download
Download link provided immediately after order completion
Instant access upon order completion.
This chapter is about the process by which an inventor (a physician) secures the expertise he needs to determine if his observations and resulting patent have commercial value. It is also about the process by which the university accepts the engagement. A physician with an unproven patent contracting with a university for market and scientific research that would establish the commercial viability of his invention. It explores patterns of social networking, searching, communications, and negotiations theory to describe an inventor’s quest for evidence that his invention worked. The chapter outlines the process by which the physician searched his network to find resources outside of his field of expertise that could guide his next steps in evaluating the commercial potential of his invention. In addition, it describes the information gathering and negotiation process leading to a university contract. The case illustrates that the issuance of a patent does not represent either technical proficiency or market potential for an invention.
Much has been written about universities and technology transfer. Less has been written about universities and the processes for integration of knowledge between university specialties and the transfer of that integrated knowledge to parties outside the university. And, even less has been written about the issues in communication and contracting present when an inventor, from the community, seeks out a university in their quest to determine the commercial viability of their invention.
The term technology transfer gained prominence after the U.S. Congress passed of the Bayh-Dole Act of 1980. This Act and its subsequent amendments grant to the university the right to secure patents on discoveries made under federally funded research. The purpose of the law is to encourage the commercial application of research findings in pursuit of economic growth (Remington, 2005). Thus, the term technology transfer relates to discovery and invention from within the university. The term university entrepreneurship has also been linked to these concepts (Rotheraermel, Shanti et al, 2007).
Golish, Besterfield-Sacre and Shuman (2008) studied academic and corporate technology development processes and found there was little commonality among the elements in the concept maps of these two groups. The research also found that the elements missing from the concept maps of the academic inventors were related to market identification, cost evaluation, and changing customer needs/market requirements.
The passage of Bayh-Dole ushered into the university an awareness of opportunity to not only patent, license, and create new firms based on discoveries within the university, but also to collaborate with companies as a means for decimation of expertise in the university. However, around the globe, cultural differences between the university and corporations have been identified as providing obstacles to be overcome if this desire to transfer knowledge is to be fully realized (Valentín, 2000).
In both the above scenarios, invention within the university, and the transfer of knowledge through cross-collaboration between university faculty and corporations, the entities are sufficiently large to garner the attention of academic researchers. The same is not true in the case of the individual inventor. Where the popular press publishes numerous articles reporting the insights and activities of both corporate and independent inventors (Table 1), we were not successful at finding any academic research study linking an independent inventor to a research contract with a university – the subject of this case study.Table 1.
Sample of news articles on American inventors
|Inventor’s refrigeration system for planet shows promise, but scientists are skeptical|
Inventor gets the wood out: pencil made from scrap tires wins space on Staples’ shelves
So you want to be an inventor?: It’ll take money, patience to get patents, raise capital and market ideas.
Energy-Efficient Engine Technology Wins Ford Team National Inventor of the Year Award
|December 21, 2008|
March 9, 2009
April 12, 2009
May 28, 2009
|McClatchy – Tribune News Service, Washington|
Indianapolis Business Journal
The Atlanta Journal – Constitution
PR Newswire. New York
Complete Chapter List
Search this Book:
Francisco Chia Cua (University of Otago, New Zealand)
The common structured procurement process of the Request for Information (RFI), Request for Proposal (RFP), and Business Case Development (BCD) is thought to establi...
Roman Boutellier (ETH Zurich, Switzerland), Mareike Heinzen (ETH Zurich, Switzerland), Marta Raus (ETH Zurich, Switzerland)
This chapter explores the concept of paradigms, science, and technology in the context of information technology (IT). Therefore, the linear model of Francis Bacon a...
Arvind Karunakaran (The Pennsylvania State University, USA), Jingwen He (The Pennsylvania State University, USA), Sandeep Purao (The Pennsylvania State University, USA), Brian Cameron (The Pennsylvania State University, USA)
Our case will describe two small to medium enterprises which are located within the same region and sharing the broad industry sector but at a different ‘growth stag...
L. F. Pau (Copenhagen Business School, Denmark and Rotterdam School of Management, The Netherlands)
The case “Integral” is about how a multinational company specializing in machinery goods uses high technology in its field support and mandated safety solutions to m...
Desai Narasimhalu (Singapore Management University, Singapore)
Dr. Wei Siang Yu, a medical doctor who is a compulsive serial entrepreneur and the founder of the FlyFreeForHealth, has created a comprehensive medical tourism servi...
Carolyn J. Fausnaugh (Florida Institute of Technology, USA), Mary Helen McCay (Florida Institute of Technology, USA)
This chapter is about the process by which an inventor (a physician) secures the expertise he needs to determine if his observations and resulting patent have commer...