Silver Linings: From Emergency Remote Teaching to EAP Resiliency

Silver Linings: From Emergency Remote Teaching to EAP Resiliency

Cristina Tat, Sean Eric Kil P. Gay, Bradley D. F. Colpitts, Thomas P. Stones, Lucas A. Dickerson, Mahboubeh Rakhshandehroo
Copyright: © 2022 |Pages: 26
DOI: 10.4018/978-1-6684-4205-0.ch006
OnDemand:
(Individual Chapters)
Available
$37.50
No Current Special Offers
TOTAL SAVINGS: $37.50

Abstract

This chapter explores the experiences of six educators and course coordinators working within an English for academic purposes (EAP) program at a private university in Western Japan. The authors leverage an action-research approach to examine their own narratives surrounding the challenges of adjusting to emergency remote teaching (ERT) during the COVID-19 pandemic. The authors wrote narratives regarding the daunting task of using digital tools to convert face-to-face content into ERT. The authors coded each other's narratives and then used the auto-hermeneutic approach to analyze the data to find recommendations for improving pedagogy and practice. The chapter offers insight into best practice for those embedded in EAP or other similarly interconnected, multi-faceted content higher education programs. The results suggest educators need to help cultivate greater institutional, faculty, and student competency with educational technologies and to explore evidence-based pedagogy related to online learning to prepare for future instances of ERT.
Chapter Preview
Top

Introduction

The global COVID-19 pandemic necessitated a rapid adaptation to emergency remote teaching (ERT)—described as “a temporary shift of instructional delivery to an alternate delivery mode due to crisis circumstances” (Hodges et al., 2020, p. 7). It impacted all levels of education (Watermeyer et al., 2021; Wong et al., 2021), with instructors, learners, and institutions thrust into an “emergency management cycle” whereby new strategies, approaches, and skills were developed (Alexander, 2002). Worldwide, ERT was complicated by varied levels of institutional support and digital capacity (Can & Silman-Karanfil, 2022; Watermeyer et al., 2021), with higher education institutions often ill-equipped for the sudden change due to a lack of prioritization of digital technologies within learning ecosystems (Colpitts et al., 2020). This was particularly pronounced in the context of Japanese higher education (HE), which had a notable lack of digital infrastructure and institutional preparedness compared to other established HE markets (Funamori, 2017; Vasilache, 2017). Thus, ERT presented a unique challenge to learners, instructors, and institutions alike and necessitated a radical departure from the status quo in Japanese HE. This paper aims to shed light on one such case at a coordinated English for academic purposes (EAP) program at the tertiary level in Japan, told from the perspective of the instructors coordinating some parts of the program.

Issues for Instructors

Initially, there were reports of a significant negative impact on educators, stemming from a variety of factors, including health concerns, anxiety, and uncertainty; professional concerns relating to their own, their institutions,’ and their students’ facility with digital platforms; and an increased workload (Can & Silman-Karanfil, 2022; Wong et al., 2021). Further factors included disenfranchisement due to prior face-to-face teaching skills becoming redundant and inaccessible (Ashton, 2022), concerns about student engagement (Ferri et al., 2020), and issues arising from the lack of direct student contact (Kim & Asbury, 2020).

In adapting, instructors utilized a range of platforms for their classes, such as video conferencing, social media, text chats, free online resources, and various virtual learning environments (Li, 2022; Pu, 2020). Using information and communication technology (ICT) became increasingly important, albeit ICT competency level and the need for support varied among instructors (Gao & Zhang, 2020). Synchronous online teaching (Peachey, 2017), through platforms such as Zoom or Microsoft Teams, became ubiquitous to facilitate live interaction, but this was often frustrated by a lack of prior experience and inadequate training (Moser et al., 2021). Such classes have been found to be mixed in their efficacy with one case study identifying primarily contrived, instructor-driven dialogue with a lack of engagement among students who often switched off their cameras (Cheung, 2021a). However, there were also positives, such as the removal of physical proximity, which led to reduced anxiety in some (Satar & Ozdenar, 2008) and the enhanced participation of weaker students through text chat functions (Cheung, 2021b).

As instructors adapted and became more competent in their use of the available technology, the quality of live interaction improved (Gao & Zhang, 2020). This underscores the importance of instructors in the success of ERT (Rapanta et al., 2020). For instance, instructors learned to adapt strategies to provide meaningful feedback for students via online platforms (Al Damen, 2020), which allowed for increased instructor agency (Ashton, 2022). Indeed, after the initial sudden adjustment to online learning, many instructors were able to embrace the necessity for ICT as part of their pedagogical repertoire and came to regard it as a valuable professional development experience (Dohaney et al., 2020; Li, 2022). Many were able to work with students to create innovative solutions and learning spaces as both adjusted to the new environment (Harsch et al., 2021).

Key Terms in this Chapter

Evidence-Based Pedagogy: The development of course curricula informed by academic research.

In-House Materials Development: The creation of textbooks and other instructional materials by the teaching staff at an institution. This practice replaces the use of teaching materials published in the academic press with materials created by the institution’s teaching staff.

Information and Communication Technology (ICT): Also known as Information Technology (IT), it refers to all communication technologies, including the internet, videoconferencing, etc.

Coordinated Curriculum: A curriculum that is centrally planned and delivered in a manner that ensures educational opportunities are substantially equal in quality and delivery across all sections of the same course.

Emergency Remote Teaching (ERT): A temporary change in the modality of course delivery due to a crisis.

Resilience: The ability of a system to recover quickly from difficulties.

English for Academic Purposes (EAP): Language necessary for studies or work in English medium higher education.

Complete Chapter List

Search this Book:
Reset