The Approach of the Islamist Press in Turkey to the Murder of Samuel Paty: A Qualitative Content Analysis

The Approach of the Islamist Press in Turkey to the Murder of Samuel Paty: A Qualitative Content Analysis

Eren Ekin Ercan
Copyright: © 2022 |Pages: 15
DOI: 10.4018/978-1-7998-9755-2.ch002
OnDemand:
(Individual Chapters)
Available
$37.50
No Current Special Offers
TOTAL SAVINGS: $37.50

Abstract

The teacher Samuel Paty, who was decapitated on 16 October 2020 for showing cartoons of The Prophet Mohammad in a lecture in France, is an important indicator of the postmodern conceptual debate between “freedom of expression” and “terrorism.” It is not a coincidence that many similar events, especially the Charlie Hebdo attack in 2015, took place in France. The phenomenon of freedom of expression, which came to the fore during the 1789 French Revolution and its aftermath, made France a historical heir and the target of radical terrorist attacks. In this context, the study examines how the murder of Samuel Paty was interpreted on the websites of Yeni Şafak and Yeni Akit newspapers, which stand out with their Islamic journalism approach. The qualitative content analysis method was used in the study. The focus of the study is how the developments were reported by the newspapers on the day of the murder (October 16, 2020) and after.
Chapter Preview
Top

Modernization And Islam In Turkey: A Contextual Brief History

The first of the most important breaks in the rise of Islam through politics in Turkey is the developments after The Rescript of Gulhane (1839). Reforms to save the crumbling Ottoman Empire brought some Western-style developments. Three elements stood out especially in the institutional and therefore historical sense: Religion, bureaucracy, and the army (Berkes, 2003, pp. 169-171). Starting from the end, the army was at the center of the idea of saving the empire, along with the lands lost as a result of the Serbian and Greek uprisings. It was thought that if a strong army was formed, the empire would return to its old days (Kahraman, 2008, p. 4-5). Bureaucracy, on the other hand, has made the civil servant class compulsory based on education as an extension of the modern state understanding. A natural consequence of this was the law. In addition, with The Rescript of Gulhane (Tanzimat), the sultan's powers were limited, tax and judicial regulations were made, and perhaps most importantly, the existence of private property was accepted. In other words, the law was emphasized as an intangible value. Later, when the emphasis on equal citizenship was added to this with the Reform Edict (Islahat) (1856), unrest emerged among the masses who had been living under a traditional religious state for centuries (Avcıoğlu, 1996, p. 229-231).

On the other hand, it should be noted that all these modernization attempts are “necessary” and “raw” ideas. Because all these initiatives were seen as a means of saving the state rather than being a project aiming directly at modernization (Ortaylı, 2009, p. 38). Moreover, in both Tanzimat and Islahat thought, the prevention of nationalist thought is at the forefront. The reason behind this is that the nationalist movement that spread all over Europe after the French Revolution was perceived as the cause of the collapse of the Ottoman Empire (Berkes, 2003, pp. 436-437). Therefore, this situation, which constitutes one of the main lines of the historical and political tension between Turkey and France, has been further reinforced by the spread of thoughts on the nation-state and human rights. One of the best examples of this from the field of the press is the publication of the first newspaper published in the Ottoman Empire by the French. The main purpose of publishing this newspaper called Bulletin des Novalles (1795) in Istanbul was to promote the French Revolution and spread its ideals. Similarly, the newspapers Gazette Française de Constantinople (1796) in Istanbul, Le Spectateur Oriental (1821), Le Smyrnéen (1824) and Le Moniteur Ottoman (1831) were published in Izmir by the French. In addition, the Journal de Constantinople (1846), La Turquie (1866), Impartial (1841), La Réforme (1869), Le Phare du Bosphore (1870), Levant-Herald (1867), Stamboul (1875) are other newspapers published (Topuz, 2003, pp. 34-39). Therefore, it is possible to say that there was an important intellectual exchange with the French after the French Revolution in Turkey.

Key Terms in this Chapter

Samuel Paty: Teacher killed in France on October 16, 2020. Paty was killed for showing cartoons in the context of freedom of expression in class.

Murder: Taking someone's life. In this study, it is used in the context of execution related to freedom of expression.

Turkey: It is the country that forms the focus of the study. Among the existing newspapers, the two most prominent newspapers with their Islamist line are discussed.

France: It is an important country that has influenced world history, especially the French Revolution. In this study, it is included because the attack was in France.

Freedom of Speech: The concept that came to the fore with the French Revolution in world history and is the basic element of democracy. In the study, it was used in the context of evaluating the limits of the freedom understanding of the Islamist press.

Terrorism: Intimidation is an attempt to put pressure on a person or social group and to take away their freedom of expression with the aim of killing people, destroying property, intimidating them.

Provocation: To provoke a person or group to deviate from its purpose.

Islamist Press: The press, which treats the Islamist understanding as an ideology and interprets the news as such.

Complete Chapter List

Search this Book:
Reset