The Strategies of 3D Modelling in the QS Profession

Research Problems

In this modern era with the introduction of 3D modelling software, some of the construction players are still adopting the use of traditional paper-based methods due to the difficulty of adopting connected devices. The most significant reason individuals are hesitant to use new technology is the failure to adapt people's behaviour to manage new tools (Zahrizan et al., 2013). 3D modelling software would be a productivity boost that is highly welcomed by a skilled quantity surveyor who is familiar with the concepts and specifications of a building. However, the same application used by a junior quantity surveyor, or undergraduates who do not have the same knowledge, would put them in a different position (Ibrahim, 2007). For those who are not well informed about or proficient in the use of modern technology, the myriad of new construction technology can be intimidating. Virtual reality, wearable technology, and a variety of applications and project management software may be required of those individuals. Many people work in the construction sector because they prefer working with their hands and have a nostalgic sense for older construction methods. It is possible that incorporating technology will be met with resistance. One of the major barriers to technology adoption is whether employees will accept it as a part of their daily work lives (McClone, 2019).

Another challenge faced by quantity surveyors is the lack of professional support. Despite the fact that 3D modelling is known for aiding the cross-border interchange of electronic data, Malaysian professions, trades, and industries are still confined by cultural and geographical limits, as well as political identities. In Malaysia, the Government constraints and mandates the limits of Engineering Consulting Services (ECS) (Zainon et al., 2016). Furthermore, with the exception of the more difficult ventures, the majority of local enterprises are still handled by local personnel who follow local norms. Hence, it has been demonstrated that professionals or consultants with the requisite skills and competence are required to make 3D modelling deployment a success (Zainon et al., 2018).

Technical challenges are also one of the barriers in implementing 3D modelling software. Among the factors are a lack of support system, difficulties understanding advanced software, and scarcity of competent technical workers (Zainon et al., 2018). Furthermore, one contractor has stated that if his information system was not linked with the technology used, they risked losing business and incurring additional costs. As a result, the firm hired an external consultant to ensure that the IT was in sync with the new technology. However, this can be costly, and it may force the organisation to incur ongoing expenses that it cannot afford (Love et al., 2001). There are several compelling reasons why 3D modelling software adoption in Malaysia has lagged behind expectations. In comparison to societal challenges, it is difficult for the industry to adopt new information technology (IT). Among the factors are lack of support system, difficulties understanding advanced software, and scarcity of competent technical workers. As detailed and precise models are necessary to tackle interoperability issues, 3D modelling may have had a low acceptance rate (Zainon et al., 2016). As a result, the research gap has been identified to study the challenges and postulate the solutions in 3D modelling.