As a nationwide e-government project in South Korea, the Information Network Village project was launched in 2001. It was designed to increase accessibility to e-government services by reducing the digital divide in rural areas and to improve the income level of local residents by boosting regional economy through e-commerce. As of 2007, more than 300 villages are working on- and off-line. Information centers, networked to high-speed Internet, were built in each village. Personal computers were distributed to most households and a website of each village was created to facilitate e-commerce activities. Government reports and evaluation research highlight the performance of the six-year-old project. This chapter revisits, not the performance, but the governance structure, the implementation process, managerial capability, and the administrative value of the project for the purpose of further strengthening its enabler-role in reducing the digital divide and expediting regional development. Policy lessons are summarized to foster the sustainability of e-government projects with consideration of diverse perspectives.
The advent of the Internet and other information communication technologies (ICTs) has fundamentally changed the environment as well as the process in which governments deliver public services to citizens, business, and other government entities. Internal and external relationships of the public sector were transformed by applying ICTs to promote government accountability, increase administrative efficiency, and induce active public participation. Most countries around the world and most localities within a national boundary try to ride the crest of the e-government wave. In their process of implementing e-government projects, however, many countries are facing the issue of the digital divide as a major barrier or risk (Malecki, 2003; Norris, 2001). South Korea is no exception. While e-government in South Korea is working as a powerful enabling tool to increase efficiency, enhance transparency, and facilitate public participation (Choudrie & Lee, 2004), there are regional disparities in network infrastructure and human resources, as well as economic and knowledge gaps that need to be addressed (Im & Seo, 2005).
As a nationwide effort to reduce the divide, the Information Network Village (INVIL) project was launched in 2001. The project was initiated by the government recognizing that the benefits from its successful ICT applications and strong e-government capability should be shared with the entire population for a continuous and stable development of the country. Within a short period of implementing the project, many government reports highlighted the positive aspects of the project and its performance (Korea Association of Local Informatization, 2006a & 2007; Ministry of Government Administration and Home Affairs, 2006). Evaluation research reconfirmed its achievement by elaborating the government reports. Kim and Kim (2004) reviewed the income change of village residents in mountainous areas who took full advantage of the project’s e-commerce capacity for marketing local specialties. Kim (2007) emphasized that active on-line communication and interaction among village residents contributed to the rehabilitation of regional communities. Lee (2005) characterized the project and its performance as a strategic way toward a nationwide innovation rather than a regional change. Other studies provide policy recommendations for improving the program management by analyzing under-performing aspects of the project. Jung and Son (2007) suggested that a successful INVIL project should not only supply PCs or ICT equipment to rural areas, but also integrate local attractions, socio-cultural diversity, and technological components of the project. In particular, tourism was shown to be a critical factor in improving regional economy (Choi, 2005). Seo (2005) warned that excessive emphasis on e-commerce could lead village residents to narrowly define the project goal as maximizing financial profitability, and to undervalue other aspects of the project such as community building, universal access, and democratic participation.
There are also critical voices against the project. Citizens Action Network (2005), a non-profit organization in South Korea monitoring budget process and transparency in public agencies, selected the INVIL project as a case of wasting government money because the project could not foster the villages’ capability to generate financial resources for their own management. Unless each village finds a market niche for e-commerce activities, governments should either keep supporting them or reshape the implementation strategy and the target group of the INVIL project. Special reports by the Kukmin Daily News, a major national news paper, are very skeptical of the project’s performance. Site visits to the villages along with in-depth interviews with the residents reveal that most of the PCs and ICT equipment distributed to the villages are underused and a limited number of villages are maintaining e-commerce activities (Lee, 2007).
Key Terms in this Chapter
E-Government Sustainability: It refers to a state or process of government operation and service delivery by applying technologies, that can be maintained at a viable level by its own resources and capability,
Top-Down Approach: It means a process by which individuals, groups, or agencies on the higher level of a hierarchy transform their values, interests, and preferences in making policies.
INVIL Project: It stands for the Information Network Village project which was initiated by South Korean government in 2001. The project was designed to increase rural residents’ accessibility to e-government services by reducing the digital divide in local areas and to improve their income level by boosting regional economy through e-commerce.
Digital Divide: It refers to the gap between those who have access and those who do not to information technology, digital resources, and online services. It includes any imbalance or disparity in skills, resources, or knowledge needed to make activities in the digital environment.
Techno-Centric Perspective: It refers to a viewpoint which emphasizes technological components in designing, implementing, and evaluating policies or projects.
Orgaware: It means a component of information system or e-government project which manages and controls technological components by utilizing human resource and organizational capability.
Complete Chapter List
Christopher G. Reddick
Christopher G. Reddick
Vishanth Weerakkody, Gurjit Dhillon
Bryan Reece, Kim Andreasson
Tina Jukic, Mateja Kunstelj, Mitja Decman, Mirko Vintar
Lourdes Torres, Vicente Pina, Basilio Acerete, Sonia Royo
Stephen K. Aikins
Janita Stuart, Val Hooper
Sonja Knapp, Yun Chen, Andy Hamilton, Volker Coors
Jennifer Evans-Cowley, Maria Manta Conroy
Michael J. Jensen
Yu-Che Chen, Ashley Dorsey
Don-yun Chen, Tong-yi Huang, Naiyi Hsiao, Tze-Luen Lin, Chung-Pin Lee
Greg Streib, Ignacio Navarro
Suzanne J. Piotrowski, Erin L. Borry
Marc Holzer, Aroon Manoharan
Bekir Parlak, Zahid Sobaci
Patrizia Lombardi, Ian Cooper, Krassimira Paskaleva-Shapira, Mark Deakin
Raoul J. Freeman
Jussi S. Jauhiainen, Tommi Inkinen
Sean M. Bossinger
Sukumar Ganapati, Christian F. Schoepp
Paul M.A. Baker, Avonne Bell, Nathan W. Moon
Roland J. Cole, Isabel A. Cole, Jennifer A. Kurtz
Jenni Viitanen, Richard Kingston
Muhammad Mustafa Kamal, M. Themistocleous
Genie N.L. Stowers
Howard A. Frank
Andreas Ask, Mathias Hatakka, Åke Grönlund
Samiaji Sarosa, Jenjang Sri Lestari
Maniam Kaliannan, Hazman Shah Abdullah, Murali Raman
Sam Lubbe, Shawren Singh
José Rodrigues Filho, João Rodrigues dos Santos Junior
R. K. Mitra, M. P. Gupta, G. P. Sahu