Voice of the Coast: A Review on Ethical Issues of Scientists Who Engage in the Sri Lankan Fishing Community

Voice of the Coast: A Review on Ethical Issues of Scientists Who Engage in the Sri Lankan Fishing Community

DOI: 10.4018/978-1-6684-8526-2.ch011
OnDemand:
(Individual Chapters)
Available
$37.50
No Current Special Offers
TOTAL SAVINGS: $37.50

Abstract

This chapter explores the ethical dilemmas faced by social scientists while interacting with the fishing community in Sri Lanka. The objective of the study is to identify and rectify these ethical difficulties with the intention of fostering responsible research procedures. This chapter uses extensive literature study and theoretical analysis covering scholarly publications, books, and reports to explore ethical issues and social science participation in fishing communities, with a focus on Sri Lanka. The findings point out the intricate interplay between cultural traditions, power dynamics, and environmental factors within the Sri Lankan Fishing Community emphasizing the need for cultural sensitivity and the need to involve the community in research design. This chapter has implications for future research and interventions in fishing communities worldwide, highlighting the intricacies and interdependencies of the Sri Lankan Fishing Community and emphasizing culturally sensitive research design, community engagement, and ethical considerations.
Chapter Preview
Top

Introduction

As researchers engage with communities, such as the Fishing Community, it becomes increasingly important to comprehend and address the ethical dimensions of their involvement in social science research (Sarathchandra et al., 2018). When social science researchers study this small-scale representation of society, it is crucial for them to carefully address the ethical concerns that arise in this complex situation (Ahdan et al., 2019; Athukorala et al., 2021). This chapter explores the ethical challenges that researchers encounter when working with the Sri Lankan fishing community. It specifically examines the important aspects of cultural sensitivity, environmental impact, and the lasting effects of research efforts. The Sri Lankan fishing society surpasses the simple categorization of proficient sailors. The tapestry is a dynamic amalgamation of ancestral wisdom, convictions, and customs, harmoniously intertwined with the rhythmic movement of the waves (Béné, 2003). Fishing is more than just a job; it is a fundamental aspect of culture that influences personal identities, social organizations, and spiritual relationships with the ocean (Frangoudes & Gerrard, 2018). The deep interconnectedness with the environment intensifies the moral implications of research. The traditional fishing methods, developed and refined over centuries, are closely connected to the local ecological knowledge and sustainable practices (Sarathchandra et al., 2018). Regardless of good intentions, any study intervention has the capacity to disturb these fragile equilibriums, putting livelihoods and cultural survival at risk (Colwell & Axelrod, 2017). Adding to the complexity of the ethical situation are the economic circumstances of the community. The ocean serves as both a cultural identity and a main source of food and revenue for several families (Priyashadi et al., 2022). Research projects, especially those that have the capacity to impact resource management or policy decisions, may unintentionally provoke unforeseen economic repercussions (Koralagama, 2022). The ethical obligation, therefore, is to guarantee that research contributes to the well-being of the community, enabling their involvement in decision-making processes and ensuring equitable distribution of potential benefits.

However, the ethical considerations encompass more than just the immediate concerns of economic prosperity or cultural safeguarding. Research findings possess the ability to mould narratives concerning the community, potentially impacting their perception by both the wider society and the community itself (Sandaruwan et al., 2023). Responsible research entails guaranteeing data ownership and control, upholding the right to self-representation, and giving priority to community-driven research priorities. These components are essential not only to prevent harm but also to enable the community to actively participate in determining their own future. To successfully traverse this complex ethical situation, it is essential to adopt a thorough and sophisticated strategy. This chapter utilizes a theoretical framework that incorporates ideas of cultural sensitivity, environmental sustainability, and long-term ethical responsibility. This discourse rigorously assesses existing research methodologies and proposes adaptations to foster culturally appropriate and ethically sound engagement with the community. These improvements involve using reflective approaches that acknowledge the subjective nature of researchers' opinions and the power dynamics present in research interactions. Furthermore, there is a proactive endeavor to alleviate any biases. Moreover, the chapter promotes collaborative research approaches that prioritize the active involvement of the community and the exchange of knowledge. Through the active participation of community people in the design, collection, and analysis of study data, researchers can go beyond surface-level engagement and cultivate authentic partnerships based on mutual respect and trust (Smith, 2012). These partnerships also can collaboratively generate influential research that tackles community needs and goals, resulting in beneficial and enduring results.

Key Terms in this Chapter

Cultural Sensitivity: Cultural sensitivity is acknowledging and honoring the wide range of cultural practices, beliefs, and values, while guaranteeing that research methods are thoughtful and encompassing other cultural viewpoints.

Ethical Considerations: Ethical issues encompass the deliberate analysis and incorporation of moral concepts and norms into the research procedure, guaranteeing the well-being and entitlements of participants while upholding the study's integrity.

Power Dynamics: It refers to the imbalanced allocation of influence or authority in social exchanges, which impact relationships and decision-making procedures, especially in research settings.

Ethical Dilemma: Ethical difficulties arise in research when opposing moral principles or values create challenges in decision-making, necessitating thoughtful examination of the ethical consequences.

Theoretical Analysis: Theoretical analysis entails the scrutiny and interpretation of research findings within the confines of known theoretical views or models, so facilitating a more profound comprehension of the subject matter.

Complete Chapter List

Search this Book:
Reset