This chapter provides an in depth discussion of the issues involved in integrating learning design and learning objects into generic Web sites. It has a dual focus and consists of two parts: the first part outlines and critiques the notion of the Net Generation and its implications for learning design, while the second part is based on a case study of a generic academic learning support Web site and allows for the testing of some of the theoretical assumptions about the Net Generation. Informed by empirical research, this chapter concludes by offering suggestions on ways to exploit convergent possibilities of integrating learning design and learning objects in a Web environment, while paying careful attention to divergent capabilities of students targeted in such an environment.
This chapter is concerned with working towards a tighter fit between the possibilities that new technologies provide for learning design and learning objects on the one hand, and an increasingly diverse student body on the other. When it comes to applying new technologies in an educational context, the emphasis tends to be on the potential that these technologies offer, often accompanied by a brief disclaimer that these technologies also facilitate fragmentations with greater disparities between the information-haves and have-nots. Not surprisingly, this simultaneous movement between possibilities and the skills/knowledge required to capitalise on those possibilities, presents the biggest challenge for an e-education environment.
The notion of the Net Generation (Oblinger & Oblinger, 2005) attempts to capture the apparently fast changing skills/ knowledge sets of a “new generation,” and ascribe specific characteristics to that generation such as ability to read visual images, visual-spatial skills, digital literacy, and connectedness, amongst others. These kinds of characteristics would have major implications for the area of learning design and learning objects, particularly in terms of their applications. But just as with earlier attempts to define generations, the boundaries between them are porous, and the concept should thus be approached with appropriate caution. This applies in particular to a tertiary e-education environment which is increasingly characterised by a highly diverse student population, not only culturally but also in terms of “techno literacy.” In this context, the challenge for e-education becomes one of balancing convergent possibilities of integrating learning design and learning objects in a Web environment with divergent capabilities of diverse student cohorts. As Hughes (2004, p. 364) argues, “the ability and potential (of e-learning) to enhance access to education, particularly higher education, is largely determined by the potential learner’s circumstances, which in many ways define the learning environment.” Thus, the challenge is one of designing effective learning experiences in an increasingly diverse tertiary education context.
This chapter addresses the above challenge in a general sense in the first instance, before applying the resultant insights to an empirical case study of an academic learning support site at the University of Southern Queensland (USQ), to forge links between theory and practice. USQ is well placed to conduct such a study because as a regional Australian university, it has both a highly diverse and a geographically dispersed student population, with more than 75% of its students studying in distance education mode. The case study involves a Web site called ALSOnline (Academic Learning Support Online), which is currently in the process of being redeveloped, and the study was designed to provide insights into what would make it more “user friendly,” both with regards to learning objects and the convergent possibilities of presenting and designing those objects.
The study consists of a survey of first year students from five large first year courses in five different faculties, and a follow-up series of in-depth interviews, conducted through MSN Messenger. The online survey asked questions about learning objects, accessibility, navigation, and organisation of content. The interviews paint a more in-depth picture of learner needs and capabilities and in particular the needs and capabilities of a diverse student population. This in turn raises questions about how to (re-)design a generic site like ALSOnline. For example, to what extent do we incorporate multimodal design? This would take advantage of convergent possibilities by incorporating and combining a variety of different media, which the Internet is ideally placed to accommodate. In addition, it would be tailored to the Net Generation with its “visual-spatial” skills, its “attentional deployment” (ability to shift attention rapidly from one task to another) and its “experiential preference” (prefer to learn by doing rather than by being told what to do). At the same time however, it raises questions about Internet access, and about the assumptions of the Net Generation’s skills themselves.
Key Terms in this Chapter
Learning Design: An application of a pedagogical model for a specific learning objective, target group, and a specific context or knowledge domain. The learning design specifies the teaching and learning process, along with the conditions under which it occurs and the activities performed by the teachers and learners in order to achieve the required learning objectives (Conole & Fill, 2005).
Convergence: As with learning objects, there are many different definitions of convergence and not much consensus. It is often used with a specifying adjective (as in “media convergence” or “technological convergence”). In the context of this chapter, it refers to blurred boundaries between previously separate elements, particularly the potential that technological convergence offers with regards to “sharability” and “reusability” of learning objects, as well as the potential convergence between generic and course-specific learning objects.
ALSOnline: ALSOnline stands for Academic Learning Support Online. It is a generic academic support Web site designed by the Learning and Teaching Support Unit (LTSU) at USQ. URL: http://www.usq.edu.au/learningcentre/alsonline/
Generic Academic Skills: Generic academic skills are academic skills that are not course-specific. Examples include essay and report writing, question analysis, numeracy skills, critical analysis, and so on.
Edutainment: Edutainment is a hybrid game genre that relies heavily on visuals and narratives or game formats but also incorporates some type of learning objective (Green & McNeese, 2007).
Learning Styles: Learning styles reflect the diversity of the ways in which students study and learn, and academics teach and learn.
The University of Southern Queensland (USQ): The University of Southern Queensland (USQ) is a dual-mode institution with “triple-option” teaching modes (on-campus, distance education, and online). It is currently the second largest distance education provider in Australia, with 75% of its students studying in this mode, with almost 90 nationalities represented (Sankey, 2006). URL: http://www.usq.edu.au/
The Net Generation: The Net Generation (also called “Digital Natives,” “Y Generation,” “Next Generation,” and “Millennials”) is a group of individuals, born roughly between 1980 and 1994, who have been characterised by their familiarity with and reliance on information and communication technologies (ICTs) (Kennedy et al., 2006).
Neomillennial Learning Approach: A neomillennial learning approach is concerned with designing learning materials to cater to learners with a range of different learning modalities and backgrounds. Designing for multimodal learners may reduce the impact of providing course materials to a very diverse and an increasingly nontraditional student body (Sankey, 2006).
Learning Object: On a basic level, learning objects are educational resources that can be employed in technology-supported learning (McGreal, 2004). However, there are many different definitions that run from the very general to the very specific, with little consensus. This chapter follows Downes’ (2004) approach who advocates that learning objects should be defined by the problems they solve.
Complete Chapter List
Lori Lockyer, Sue Bennett, Shirley Agostinho, Barry Harper
Lori Lockyer, Sue Bennett, Shirley Agostinho, Barry Harper
Isobel Falconer, Allison Littlejohn
Rob Koper, Yongwu Miao
David Griffiths, Oleg Liber
Franca Garzotto, Symeon Retalis
Sherri S. Frizell, Roland Hübscher
Peter Goodyear, Dai Fei Yang
Barry Harper, Ron Oliver
Carmel McNaught, Paul Lam, Kin-Fai Cheng
Matthew Kearney, Anne Prescott, Kirsty Young
Paul Hazlewood, Amanda Oddie, Mark Barrett-Baxendale
Robert McLaughlan, Denise Kirkpatrick
Yongwu Miao, Daniel Burgos, David Griffiths, Rob Koper
Johannes Strobel, Gretchen Lowerison, Roger Côté, Philip C. Abrami, Edward C. Bethel
Daniel Burgos, Hans G.K. Hummel, Colin Tattersall, Francis Brouns, Rob Koper
Daniel Churchill, John Gordon Hedberg
Peter Freebody, Sandy Muspratt, David McRae
David Lake, Kate Lowe, Rob Phillips, Rick Cummings, Renato Schibeci
Robert McCormick, Tomi Jaakkola, Sami Nurmi
Tomi Jaakkola, Sami Nurmi
John C Nesbit, Tracey L. Leacock
Philippe Martin, Michel Eboueya
Sue Bennett, Dominique Parrish, Geraldine Lefoe, Meg O’Reilly, Mike Keppell, Robyn Philip
William Bramble, Mariya Pachman
Kristine Elliott, Kevin Sweeney, Helen Irving
Lisa Lobry de Bruyn
Tan Wee Chuen, Baharuddin Aris, Mohd Salleh Abu
L. K. Curda, Melissa A. Kelly
Sandra Wills, Anne McDougall
Lori Lockyer, Lisa Kosta, Sue Bennett
Morag Munro, Claire Kenny
Eddy Boot, Luca Botturi, Andrew S. Gibbons, Todd Stubbs
Gilbert Paquette, Olga Mariño, Karin Lundgren-Cayrol, Michel Léonard