Insights Into Undertaking a Three-Article Dissertation

Insights Into Undertaking a Three-Article Dissertation

Shirley Marie Matteson, Rebecca W. DeLozier
Copyright: © 2022 |Pages: 20
DOI: 10.4018/978-1-7998-8283-1.ch013
OnDemand:
(Individual Chapters)
Available
$37.50
No Current Special Offers
TOTAL SAVINGS: $37.50

Abstract

While still considered non-traditional, the popularity of the three-article dissertation is increasing. This variation on the conventional dissertation format consists of three publication-ready articles that cohesively address an overarching research problem. As much as the traditional format, it showcases students' research and writing skills while providing an opportunity to engage in multiple research projects. This chapter describes the differences between a conventional dissertation and a three-article dissertation format, delving into the different phases of the latter. Based on their experiences with the format, the authors offer insight for faculty mentors and doctoral students interested in pursuing a three-article dissertation, including its associated challenges and advantages.
Chapter Preview
Top

The Stages Of The Three-Article Dissertation

The decision to complete a three-article dissertation should be made with a full consideration of the advantages and disadvantages of the format. Students and their dissertation committees should have multiple discussions about the format. In addition, faculty and students must consider whether the format is approved by the institution, college, and program. Figure 1 depicts the stages of preparing a three-article dissertation.

Figure 1.

A graphical representation of the stages to a three-article dissertation

978-1-7998-8283-1.ch013.f01

The content of the phases is as follows:

Key Terms in this Chapter

Comprehensive/Qualifying Exams: The summary exam after the completion of coursework that indicates the student should be admitted to candidacy.

Dissertation/Ph.D. by Publication: An alternative means for completing the major written project for a doctoral program. The candidate is the author of a specific number of publications that often have specific requirements.

Dissertation Defense: A formal, open meeting during which the candidate is examined concerning the content and format of the final major written project.

Candidacy: A formal step in the doctoral process that indicates the student has completed all necessary coursework and examinations and can start the dissertation.

Institutional Review Board: An institutional level unit that authorizes human subjects research projects.

Dissertation Committee: Three to five faculty members who guide the dissertation. Institutions have requirements as to composition and other aspects.

Dissertation/Thesis Formatting Requirements: Guidelines established by the institution regarding the written requirements for the final major research project.

Dissertation/Thesis: The culminating major written project for many doctoral/master's programs guided by a committee and defended in an open meeting.

Gantt Chart: A bar chart that displays an expected project schedule.

Dissertation Proposal: A presentation of the topic and methods used to complete the final major written project.

Author Agreement: A document developed by the committee and student that outlines author order and responsibilities on any publication resulting from the dissertation.

Text Structure Analysis: An activity developed by Stevens (2018) AU7: The in-text citation "Stevens (2018)" is not in the reference list. Please correct the citation, add the reference to the list, or delete the citation. for examining the structure of articles for a specific journal.

Complete Chapter List

Search this Book:
Reset