Quantitative Nanostructure-Activity Relationship Models for the Risk Assessment of NanoMaterials

Quantitative Nanostructure-Activity Relationship Models for the Risk Assessment of NanoMaterials

Eleni Vrontaki (NovaMechanics Ltd., Cyprus & University of Athens, Greece), Thomas Mavromoustakos (University of Athens, Greece), Georgia Melagraki (NovaMechanics Ltd., Cyprus) and Antreas Afantitis (NovaMechanics Ltd., Cyprus)
DOI: 10.4018/978-1-4666-8136-1.ch014
OnDemand PDF Download:


In the last few decades, nanotechnology has been deeply established into human's everyday life with a great number of applications in cosmetics, textiles, electronics, optics, medicine, and many more. Although nanotechnology applications are rapidly increasing, the toxicity of some nanomaterials to living organisms and the environment still remains unknown and needs to be explored. The traditional toxicological evaluation of nanoparticles with the wide range of types, shapes, and sizes often involves expensive and time-consuming procedures. An efficient and cheap alternative is the development and application of predictive computational models using Quantitative Nanostructure-Activity Relationship (QNAR) methods. Towards this goal, researchers are mainly focused on the adverse effects of metal oxides and carbon nanotubes, but to date, QNAR studies are rare mainly because of the limited number of available organized datasets. In this chapter, recent studies for predictive QNAR models for the risk assessment of nanomaterials are reported and the perspectives of computational nanotoxicology that deeply relies on the intense collaboration between experimental and computational scientists are discussed.
Chapter Preview


According to the U.S. National Nanotechnology Initiative (NNI), nanotechnology is defined as the understanding and control of matter at dimensions of roughly 1 to 100 nanometers, where unique phenomena enable novel applications. At this level, the physical, chemical, and biological properties of materials differ in fundamental and variable ways from the properties of individual atoms and molecules or bulk matter (NNI, 2000).

Nanotechnology has become one of the most promising areas of science and it has fairly emerged as one of the central new technologies in the 21st century, drawing worldwide attention (Haase, Tentschert, & Luch, 2012; Fourches, Pu, & Tropsha, 2011). Hitherto, nanotechnology is an important industrial sector in industrialized countries and it has been referred to as the next industrial revolution. The first national nanotechnology program (NNI) was launched in USA in 2000, to serve as the central point of communication, cooperation, and collaboration for all Federal agencies engaged in nanotechnology research, bringing together the expertise needed to advance this broad and complex field (Bondarenko, 2013). Nanotechnology has found numerous applications in materials science, medicine, cosmetics, or clothing, bioimaging, sensing and electronics (Fourches et al., 2011; Makarucha, Todorova, & Yarovsky, 2011). Nanomedicine, for instance, an emerging application of nanotechnology, provides the possibility of delivering small drug molecules to specific cells, by developing novel diagnostics and therapeutics (Wang, Byrne, Napier, & DeSimone, 2011).

Up to date, several classifications of nanomaterials have been proposed. According to the European Committee for Standardization (CEN) Technical Specification, nanomaterials can be classified into two broad categories, namely nanoobjects and nanostructured materials (Figure 1) (Haase et al., 2012).

Figure 1.

Classification of nanomaterials according to CEN/ISO TS 27687; Nanoplates have one external dimension, nanorods two orthogonal dimensions, and nanoparticles all three orthogonal dimensions in the nanoscale.

(ISO 2008).

According to Hansen, Larsen, Olsen and Baun (2007) and depending on the location of the nanoscale structure in the system, nanomaterials are organized into three broad categories, as it depicted in Figure 2.

Complete Chapter List

Search this Book: