Trends and Challenges in Formative Assessment of Reading and Writing: Online EAP Contexts

Trends and Challenges in Formative Assessment of Reading and Writing: Online EAP Contexts

DOI: 10.4018/978-1-6684-6227-0.ch001
OnDemand:
(Individual Chapters)
Available
$37.50
No Current Special Offers
TOTAL SAVINGS: $37.50

Abstract

The digital transformation of English for academic purposes (EAP) settings has gained momentum as a result of innovations in educational technology. Both face-to-face and remote instruction witnessed the use of various online tools to support language learning. Based on recent research findings, this chapter discusses specific ways online formative assessment could and should be used when engaging students in critical discussion of the reading content, checking their reading comprehension and vocabulary acquisition, facilitating the peer assessment process for writing, and providing teacher feedback. It is concluded with a critical discussion of the most pertinent challenges researchers and practitioners are likely to encounter, including, but not limited to, monitoring and managing peer interactions and ensuring progress-oriented peer feedback, and creating formative assessments that go beyond prompting learners to select an instructor-written choice statement in multiple-choice quizzes towards involving critical thinking.
Chapter Preview
Top

Introduction

Even though online language learning and assessment practices existed prior to the emergence of COVID-19, it was not until the pandemic that most educators had to undertake the challenge of reshaping instructional tasks within an entirely online format for the first time. Many instructors have been in search of effective tools and methods that could not only simulate the communicative affordances of face-to-face learning but also enhance learners’ language skills. Such an abrupt shift resulted in a need to rethink and transform language assessment to reflect the dynamics of online learning. Even after the recent return to face-to-face learning around the world, many online practices remained part of the instruction. Indeed, Huang et al. (2021) found that instructors had positive perceptions regarding the pedagogical, managerial, assessment, social, and developmental affordances of teaching through an online learning platform. They pointed out its benefits in recording student participation, managing group work, monitoring learners’ progress, and facilitating student communication.

Assessment is a process of data collection through observation to provide feedback and enhance current performance (Brown, 1990). It is of critical importance that English for Academic Purposes (EAP) instructors understand the measurement process, either formatively or summatively, of how many learning objectives are achieved through scaffoldings and active involvement of the instructors and learners (Fernandes et al., 2012; Mubayrik, 2020). Formative assessment is designed to continuously observe students' achievement and progress during the learning process (Martin & Collins, 2011). On the contrary, summative assessment is designed to assess student achievement at the endpoint such as after completing a course (Trumbull & Lash, 2013).

Formative reading assessments in EAP contexts are critical for monitoring and facilitating learners’ vocabulary acquisition and comprehension in English. In face-to-face settings, these assessments may often be in the form of comprehension quizzes, cloze exercises, and vocabulary quizzes. In online settings, formative assessment of reading involves the use of digital tools to evaluate learners’ growth in terms of learning objectives for reading. Digital tools have become the medium for comprehension and vocabulary quizzes. New developments in accessing and processing information have enabled immediate and personalized feedback through such tools. Immediate and automated feedback can guide the instructor towards adjusting their teaching strategies and providing necessary interventions so that students are well-prepared for academic reading tasks in the future. In addition to online quizzes, interactive tools may allow the learners to organize the ideas in the reading texts and discuss their interpretations of them. The interactivity of the formative assessment process may foster collaboration among learners while engaging them with content analysis, critical thinking, and opinion exchange.

According to Graham et al. (2015), formative writing assessments improve the writing proficiency skills of the students by evaluating the impact of the feedback on the students’ writing progress based on particular writing skills and strategies. They added that an effective formative assessment and its feedback are pertinent as it monitors students’ progress and provides information that the students can use to improve their writing skills and guide teachers with their instruction. Li (2021) posited that formative writing assessments allow teachers to identify the effectiveness of their instruction and apply modifications as needed. When assessing students formatively within an e-learning environment teachers do not need to completely reinvent the traditional formative assessments. In fact, many online formative assessment tools would pair well with traditional formative assessments. Without going on board, teachers may embed short quizzes, polls, surveys, and games as part of online formative assessment to check for understanding before moving on to the next lesson.

Key Terms in this Chapter

Telecollaboration: A process where the students collaborate to complete academic writing assignments using digital tools to write collaboratively and provide feedback to each other based on prompts from the instructor.

Digital Storytelling: A project-based assignment within a technology environment where the students are assigned to write a short script and present their project digitally.

English for Academic Purposes (EAP): Reading, writing, speaking, and listening skills in the English language are necessary for attending academic programs and participating in academic interactions.

Zone of Proximal Development: A term coined by Vygotsky referring to the difference between what learners could achieve independently and what they could achieve with guidance from more knowledgeable individuals.

Formative Assessment: Collecting information about learners’ ongoing performance during instruction so that further tasks could be designed in a way that enhances learners’ current performance levels towards learning objectives.

Automated Writing Evaluation (AWE): An online digital tool employed in an academic writing task to automatically provide mostly mechanical error feedback.

More Knowledgeable Other: Vygotskian perspective considers these peers or instructors as individuals who can support a learner thanks to having a more comprehensive level of understanding concepts or employing certain skills with more experience.

Social Annotation: Learner groups’ behavior of annotating reading texts in a collaborative manner, usually through online annotation tools.

Interaction: Communicative activity among learners with little or no teacher involvement.

Complete Chapter List

Search this Book:
Reset