Reliability Evaluation Methods for Resilient Wireless Sensor Networks

Introduction

Wireless sensor network (WSN) is a well-studied research area and it has drawn the attention of many researchers in the last two decades. WSNs are probably the best candidate for the new generation of control and monitoring systems (Akyildiz et al., 2002, Yick et al., 2008). Recent advances in wireless communication technology and micro-electro-mechanical systems (MEMS) have enabled taking advantage of tiny, low-power and low-cost sensors in wireless sensor networks. This reduction in size and cost of sensors has made them vulnerable to environmental noises which increases information inaccuracy. The other significant issue which is actually one of the major challenges in WSNs is to reliably transport of successfully sensed data over multiple hops toward sink(s) (Willig et al., 2005). As is said in (Mahmood et al., 2011, Pereora et al., 2007), reliability can be classified into two different categories i.e.

• •

  Packet reliability

• •

  Event reliability

• •

  Hop-by-Hop reliability

• •

  End-to-End reliability

Packet reliability deals with reliably transport of collected data to the sink(s) and event reliability is a factor to determine how observable an occurred event in the environment is. In fact the difference between packet reliability and event reliability is that when we talk about event reliability there is no need that all the messages reach to the sink(s), just one notification of each event is enough. Since there are strong limitations in terms of processing, memory, power and etc. energy efficient methods are presented in order to increase network’s lifetime. These approaches mostly put the sensors in the sleep mode to optimize their power consumption which leads to multi-hop data transmission. As mentioned before, successful delivery of the sensed data despite collisions, congestions and channel errors is another problem in WSNs. Both Hop-by-Hop reliability and End-to-End reliability deal with this problem. In Hop-by-Hop, all the nodes in the path are responsible for a reliable transmission whereas, in End-to-End only the source node and destination node (mostly the sink) are responsible. To increase packet or event reliability retransmission and redundancy mechanisms are offered. As is clear through End-to-End reliability and Hop-by-Hop reliability definitions, in End-to-End reliability just the source node retransmit the lost data whereas, in Hop-by-Hop reliability every single node in the path is able to retransmit the lost information by holding the data in its buffers (Mahmood et al., 2011). Redundancy mechanisms can be used instead of retransmission techniques. What a redundancy technique does is to add some overhead data to the original one which allows the receiver to recover the lost data. So to guarantee the reliability the lost packets should be retransmitted or some redundancy technique should be taken which both are an overhead on the energy consumption of the network. So to enhance the reliability, network resources should be considered besides reliable data transmission.

Consider network resources, one of the key steps offered in the design of a WSN is reliability modeling. It can be used to estimate networks elements performances in order to advance the design of the network. Usually to find out the reliability of a WSN, the designers do a three steps procedure. They first develop the network measure reliability mathematical model. Then they figure out the model’s parameters and finally based on the model and measured parameters they compute network reliability (Venkatesan et al., 2013).