Stepping into the Role of Professional Writer
Christine Aikens Wolfe (Carlow University, USA), Cheryl North-Coleman (University of Maryland, Baltimore County, USA), Shari Wallis Williams (University of Arkansas Little Rock, USA), Denise Amos (University of Louisville, USA), Glorianne Bradshaw (Valley Elementary School, USA) and Toby Emert (Agnes Scott College, USA)
Copyright: © 2009
A group of National Writing Project teachers from around the nation attended a Professional Writing Retreat in Santa Fe in 2004 and continued their collaboration. This chapter examines the progress of the group’s commitment to communicate by electronic means about writing about teaching. Teachers from the experimental group, those who answered the call to examine their continued involvement with the group, provide qualitative research narratives about how each responds as they help one another to step into the role of professional writer. Statistics gathered from both the experimental and a control group of teachers (who attended the same retreat but did not answer the survey) allow the reader to chart the teachers’ success in: (a) presenting together about being professional writers, (b) writing together as professional writers, (c) writing individually about teacher-practice, and (d) meeting at the National Writing Project’s Annual Meeting in order to continue to support each other’s work.
The authors of this chapter are National Writing Project (NWP) teacher-consultants teachers from various sites in the United States who applied to an advanced institute called the National Writing Project’s Professional Writing Retreat A. The four-day workshop focused on providing support for educators to help us publish our work. The retreat was open only to teachers who had attended one of the NWP’s Invitational Summer Institutes for teachers. Thus, this professional writing retreat was considered an advanced institute for Writing Project teachers or teacher consultants.
The authors are teachers who participated in the 2004 Professional Writing Retreat A (There is also a retreat B that helps those with finished pieces). Participants were offered a group list-serve so that they could introduce themselves before the retreat and continue professional conversations after the retreat. The 2004 Retreat A group accepted this offer as a valid ongoing opportunity. Several participants have continued to collaborate electronically in order to grow professionally. This chapter will examine the ongoing collaborations after the Professional Writing Retreat A in 2004. To date, in addition to informal opportunities for peers to provide feedback such as revising or editing, there have been seven opportunities for the larger group to work together. The seven formal opportunities included breakfast meetings at the National Writing Project’s Annual Meetings in 2004, 2005, 2006, and 2007; a presentation at the National Writing Project’s annual meeting in Pittsburgh, PA in 2005; one at the National Council for the Teachers of English (NCTE) Conference in New York City in 2007; and the opportunity to write this chapter collectively. Furthermore, the fact that a sizable group answered each of these calls is part of the serendipitous way in which group members have been able to work together; certainly the electronic conversations are at the heart of the group’s success.
Group members hope to prove to ourselves and to a larger group of Writing Project teachers that an ongoing research connection among reflective practitioners can be energizing. The case documenting that synergistic connection is presented through analysis of survey data from the experimental group (the 47% of 2004 Retreat Group A group that coauthored this chapter), through narrative documentation of the members’ synergistic cooperation, and through commentary from experimental group members about what being involved in these collaborations means for us. Finally, statistics are offered on the number of individuals from the experimental group who has been involved in publishing professional writing versus the number from the control group, those who did not collaborate this chapter (53%). Research is both qualitative and quantitative; the National Writing Project encourages narrative reflection, and the writing that we have done about our writing informs this chapter.
Group members designed a reflective instrument to measure further involvement in professional writing by those from 2004 Retreat A group. The intent was to discover if members have continued to write about their practice (i.e., continued to be reflective practitioners) attempted to become professional research writers by submitting their work to professional journals, bulletins, magazines; continued to use other members of the group as collaborative partners; and whether or not collective work is synergistic for them.Top
Background: Why The National Writing Project Supports Teacher Research
The National Writing Project was founded in 1974 at the University of California, Berkeley. NWP now has sites in all 50 states. Its mission is to improve writing in America’s schools. They do this through a professional development model that stresses teachers teaching teachers. Its purpose is trifold: (a) to better prepare teachers to integrate the craft of writing into content teaching in their classrooms; (b) to encourage and mentor teachers as they write themselves because the NWP believes that practitioners are the best teachers; and (c) to allow teachers to teach teachers, because—as their national objectives state—“the best teachers of teachers are other teachers.”
Key Terms in this Chapter
Fellow: One of three interchangeable terms used for teachers who attend the initial 4–5 week training by a local branch of the National Writing Project. Fellows (or graduates of that program) are also referred to as teacher consultants or Writing Project teachers.
National Council of Teachers of English (NCTE): A national organization initially of teachers of English, it now serves teachers from kindergarten through college who teach reading/writing. The NCTE offers support to the much smaller NWP by sharing planning for annual conventions, the NCTE’s gathering follows (and slightly overlaps) the NWP’s.
Efferent: According to Louse Rosenblatt, reader response comes from within the reader. An efferent response is associated with feelings, while an aesthetic response is associated with a reaction to the beauty of the language of a written piece.
Continuity Committee: A committee of volunteers from any National Writing Project summer institute, including the Santa Fe Professional Writing Retreat, who agree to draw that group together again to continue work/play/writing about a similar topic.
Teacher Consultant: One of three interchangeable terms used for teachers who attend the initial 4–5 week training by a local branch of the National Writing Project. Teacher consultants (or graduates of an SIT) are also referred to as fellows or Writing Project teachers.
Heuristic: Applied to arguments and methods of demonstration which are persuasive rather than logically compelling, or which lead a person to find out for himself/herself.
Reflective Practitioner: A teacher who thinks about his/her practice, who also keeps journals, logs, or other records of her/his teaching in order to review those records and consider how or why s/he might change that instruction the following year.
Summer Institute for Teachers (SIT): The 4–5 week introduction to the National Writing Project’s way of teaching. Teachers who enroll in this course (which is usually a six graduate course in English or Education) read about their pedagogy, and engage in creative, reflective and professional writing. Teachers also must make a formal presentation to their peers at the SIT about an inquiry that they have about teaching, or demonstrate a lesson that worked well for them so that fellow teachers may comment on their practice.
National Writing Project (NWP): A professional development program for teachers, it grew out of a collaborative graduate class between Jim Grey, a professor at UC in the Bay Area, and local teachers enrolled in his course. Because Grey felt that the teachers had as much to offer about the art of teaching as he did; he encouraged likeminded professorial colleagues to start similar courses around the United States. Around their philosophy grew an organization which continues to give support to the concept of university—public school collaboration.
Pedagogy: The art, practice or profession of teaching; now especially concerning systematized learning, or instruction concerning principals and methods of teaching.
Complete Chapter List
Janet Salmons, Lynn Wilson
Janet Salmons, Lynn Wilson
Neli Maria Mengalli
Niki Lambropoulos, Panagiotis Kampylis, Sofia Papadimitriou, Marianna Vivitsou, Alexander Gkikas
Chijioke J. Evoh
Sandra J. Chrystal
Tine Köhler, Michael Berry
Iris C. Fischlmayr
Jennifer V. Lock, Petrea Redmond
Darren Lee Pullen
Kathy Lynch, Aleksej Heinze, Eljse Scott
Christine Aikens Wolfe, Cheryl North-Coleman, Shari Wallis Williams, Denise Amos, Glorianne Bradshaw, Toby Emert
Garry G. Burnett
Robert J. Redmon Jr.
Janet L. Holland
Rosemarie Reynolds, Michael T. Brannick
Linda L. Larson, Paul Boyd-Batstone, Carole Cox
Andre L. Araujo
Kenneth David Strang
Apivut Chakuthip, Yvonne Brunetto, Rod Farr-Wharton, Sheryl Ramsay
Bolanle A. Olaniran
R. Todd Stephens
Mairi Stewart Kershaw
Jeroen Wolbers, Peter Groenewegen, Pieter Wagenaar
Rubye Braye, Eric Evans
Rakesh Biswas, Jayanthy Maniam, Edwin Wen Huo Lee, Shashikiran Umakanth, Premalatha Gopal Das
Beverly-Jean Daniel, April Boyington Wall
Lisa Faithorn, Baruch S. Blumberg
Lynn Wilson, Janet Salmons