Deep Learning-Based User Information Behavior Mining and Personalized Recommendation Optimization

Deep Learning-Based User Information Behavior Mining and Personalized Recommendation Optimization

Lu Zhang (School of Accounting and Finance, Anhui Xinhua University, China), Shangxin Chang (School of Finance and Economics, Nanchang Institute of Technology, China), Min Chen (School of Business, Wenzhou University, China), Anqi Zhang (School of Management, Shanghai University of International Business and Economics, China), Hongming Li (University of Florida, USA), and Sangbing Tsai (International Engineering and Technology Institute, Hong Kong)
Copyright: © 2025 |Pages: 34
DOI: 10.4018/JGIM.372058
Article PDF Download
Open access articles are freely available for download

Abstract

Personalized recommendation systems have become crucial for enhancing user experience and driving engagement in various online platforms. However, existing methods face challenges in accurately modeling high-order user-item relationships, dynamically capturing user preferences, and effectively utilizing multi-modal data. These limitations hinder their ability to deliver relevant, diverse, and context-aware recommendations. To address these challenges, we propose the Graph Attention-based Dynamic Recommendation Framework (GADR). GADR incorporates a graph attention mechanism to prioritize high-order relationships dynamically, a dual-channel structure to simultaneously model long-term and short-term user preferences, and a unified pipeline for integrating textual, visual, and behavioral data. By combining these components, GADR ensures adaptability to dynamic user behavior, improves recommendation diversity, and enhances ranking quality.
Article Preview
Top

1. Introduction

Personalized recommendation systems have become a cornerstone of modern digital platforms(Silvester & Kurian, 2023), including e-commerce, social media, and streaming services, playing a pivotal role in enhancing user experience and boosting business performance(Amiri et al., 2024). By analyzing user behaviors, such as clicks, purchases, and browsing patterns, these systems aim to predict and recommend items that align with individual preferences(Cheng & Peng, 2024). However, effectively mining and utilizing the intricate, multi-modal user behavior data presents several challenges, especially in scenarios involving sparse interactions and dynamic user interests(X. Wang et al., 2024).

One of the primary challenges in integrating multi-modal data is the inherent heterogeneity among different data types(Yeh & Wang, 2023), such as textual reviews, visual product features, and behavioral interaction data. These modalities often exist in diverse formats and scales, making it difficult to align and fuse them effectively. Additionally, inconsistent or missing data across modalities can introduce noise and bias, compromising recommendation quality(Wang et al., 2025). The high computational complexity associated with processing multi-modal data further complicates real-time recommendation tasks, where fast and efficient predictions are critical. Existing models frequently struggle to balance the contributions of each modality, often over-relying on one type of data and neglecting others, which limits the diversity and accuracy of recommendations.

Recent years have witnessed significant advancements in recommendation algorithms, particularly those leveraging deep learning techniques(Li et al., 2025; Patil et al., 2024). These methods, including Neural Graph Collaborative Filtering (NGCF)(Kobiela et al., 2023) and self-supervised learning-based frameworks(Yu et al., 2023; Zhang et al., 2025), have demonstrated their potential in capturing collaborative filtering (CF)(Koren et al., 2021) signals through graph-based representations of user-item interactions. Despite these advancements, existing approaches often fall short in fully modeling high-order connectivity, dynamic user interests, and the multi-modal nature of data(Meng et al., 2023; Nguyen et al., 2023). These limitations hinder their ability to provide accurate and personalized recommendations, particularly in scenarios with limited data or rapidly changing user preferences(Jing & Qing, 2024; Zhang et al., 2021).

Addressing these challenges requires a holistic approach that integrates high-order collaborative signals, dynamic interest modeling, and multi-modal data fusion(Ping & Yue, 2024). The core difficulty lies in effectively capturing the high-order relationships in user-item interaction graphs while simultaneously addressing the temporal dynamics of user behaviors and the inherent heterogeneity of multi-modal data(Miao, 2023). Furthermore, ensuring scalability and robustness in such systems remains a pressing issue as data volume and complexity increase(Deekshith, 2023).

To tackle these challenges, this study proposes the Graph Attention-based Dynamic Recommendation Framework (GADR). This framework builds upon recent advances in graph neural networks (GNNs) and dynamic modeling techniques(Skarding et al., 2021). GADR uniquely addresses the complexities of multi-modal data integration by leveraging a graph attention mechanism (GAT) that dynamically assigns importance to different user-item interactions, ensuring that textual, visual, and behavioral data are effectively aligned and contribute meaningfully to the recommendation process(Cui et al., 2024). This dynamic attention mechanism helps mitigate noise and improves the robustness of multi-modal fusion(Li & Song, 2024), overcoming the limitations of traditional models(Quan et al., 2024).

Complete Article List

Search this Journal:
Reset
Volume 33: 1 Issue (2025)
Volume 32: 1 Issue (2024)
Volume 31: 9 Issues (2023)
Volume 30: 12 Issues (2022)
Volume 29: 6 Issues (2021)
Volume 28: 4 Issues (2020)
Volume 27: 4 Issues (2019)
Volume 26: 4 Issues (2018)
Volume 25: 4 Issues (2017)
Volume 24: 4 Issues (2016)
Volume 23: 4 Issues (2015)
Volume 22: 4 Issues (2014)
Volume 21: 4 Issues (2013)
Volume 20: 4 Issues (2012)
Volume 19: 4 Issues (2011)
Volume 18: 4 Issues (2010)
Volume 17: 4 Issues (2009)
Volume 16: 4 Issues (2008)
Volume 15: 4 Issues (2007)
Volume 14: 4 Issues (2006)
Volume 13: 4 Issues (2005)
Volume 12: 4 Issues (2004)
Volume 11: 4 Issues (2003)
Volume 10: 4 Issues (2002)
Volume 9: 4 Issues (2001)
Volume 8: 4 Issues (2000)
Volume 7: 4 Issues (1999)
Volume 6: 4 Issues (1998)
Volume 5: 4 Issues (1997)
Volume 4: 4 Issues (1996)
Volume 3: 4 Issues (1995)
Volume 2: 4 Issues (1994)
Volume 1: 4 Issues (1993)
View Complete Journal Contents Listing