Assessment ‘for' Learning: Embedding Digital Literacy and Peer-Support of Learning into an Assessment

Assessment ‘for' Learning: Embedding Digital Literacy and Peer-Support of Learning into an Assessment

Stephen M. Rutherford, Zoë C. Prytherch
DOI: 10.4018/978-1-5225-0039-1.ch006
(Individual Chapters)
No Current Special Offers


This chapter evaluates an assessment strategy designed to reinforce learning whilst supporting the learning of the whole student cohort, through development of multimedia learning resources. Once created and evaluated, the resources were shared online for students to use in their ongoing learning and revision. The majority of the resources designed by students used an unfamiliar form of technology, showing that digital natives were eager to learn new technological skills. The depth and challenge of the resources was considerable. The chapter investigates the activity of students during this assessment and evaluates their decision-making processes in the design of their learning resources. The analysis reveals that students were aware of how technology would impact on different learning styles, and of the needs of diverse learners. The key observation is that digital natives are a rich (and largely-untapped) resource for the development of materials that can support their learning and that of their peers.
Chapter Preview


Learning and assessment typically are very closely entwined within the HE setting, and are becoming increasingly so. The outcomes of the learning process, as measured by assessment, are becoming increasingly important in the sector, for government statistics and the requirement to monitor student progress for employability. This may not be to the benefit of learning, or to the academy in general, but is a factor of contemporary education in both compulsory and post-compulsory education. The immediate tendency is to assess the learning that students have managed to achieve. However, a more-profound use of assessment is to use it to support the learning experience. Not just in driving engagement and in defining the direction of learning, but for it to be an active benefit to the learning and studying experience (Price et al, 2011), turning assessment of learning into assessment as learning, or assessment for learning.

Aligning assessment with learning and with skills development is not a novel concept, but something which often gets overlooked (Price et al., 2010; Biggs and Tang, 2003). The paradigm shift needs to move from assessment merely testing knowledge and understanding, to being an integral part of the learning experience (Orsmond et al., 2013). It is possible, through the use of assessment which is related closely to key learning outcomes, to highlight errors, provide advice and guidance, and to encourage self-reflexivity. All of this may be achieved through the use of effective and timely feedback which relates to marking criteria and provides means of feeding-forward (Price et al, 2010). The outputs of assessment can therefore be used to reinforce learning, improve skills, and to revise conceptual frameworks as part of an on-going learning journey. However, assessment need not only be a means of testing what has been taught, but can also drive, and be an integral part of the learning activity. Using formative assessment to drive learning is effective (Price et al., 2013) but summative assessment can have an equally-important role to play as part of the active learning process, if used effectively. A key facilitator of assessment and feedback can be the use of technology in the learning and assessment process. Technology can be used to enhance the assessment experience and to make it more robust (Hogarth, 2009), more flexible, or used to provide instant feedback. If used in an imaginative way, the structure of an assessment, and the appropriate use of technology to enhance the process, can make assessment a powerful facilitator of learning.

However, although assessment can be a driving force for learning, one key limitation for many forms of assessment is the degree to which they are focused on the individual. Assessments are usually designed to improve an individual’s skills or understanding, and then to feed back to that individual the level of their achievement of these competencies. It is usual for the assessment process to end at that point, with the only further use of it being the opportunity to feed forward into other, subsequent assessments undertaken by that individual. The scope for peers benefitting from the assessment output of an individual is often limited, especially outside of group-based projects. So the impact of an assessment is often very narrow in its pedagogic benefits. A key focus for this chapter is to outline a methodology by which the outputs of an assessment can be of direct use to all of the peers within the cohort, and yet also test understanding, skills, and to drive developing digital literacies together.

Key Terms in this Chapter

Wiki: A website that is constructed by the users/viewers. The audience makes contributions to the website, which may be moderated or reviewed by either an editorial team or other users.

Digital Literacy: The awareness of recent technological developments, or existing technologies, and how they can be applied in everyday life, study or industry/business.

Active Learning: An approach whereby learning is gained through the active construction and/or research of an individual, rather than through didactic delivery of content from a teacher.

Blog: A ‘Web-log’, an online diary or journal kept by an individual, group or organisation, which is then made public to a wide audience across the internet. Often Blogs invite comments and interaction from the audience.

ICT: Information and Communication Technology – technology which facilitates open, two-way communication and the acquisition of information content.

Web 2.0: A generation of cloud-based web technologies that include some form of user-interaction or authoring. Examples include wikis, blogs, social media, virtual reality and video-sharing websites.

Information Literacy: The awareness of the validity and/or potential drawbacks of information and information sources. Information literacy involves a development of the ability to assess information based on its point of origin and authenticity.

VARK: A description of learning styles as being ‘visual’, ‘auditory’, ‘Reading and writing’ or ‘Kinaesthetic’.

Complete Chapter List

Search this Book: