A Review on Reduced Environmental Impacts of Alternative Green Concrete Productions

A Review on Reduced Environmental Impacts of Alternative Green Concrete Productions

Irem Sanal
DOI: 10.4018/IJPPPHCE.2017070104
(Individual Articles)
No Current Special Offers


Concrete is being recognized for its environmental benefits in support of sustainable development. In response to growing environmental and economic forces, regulatories, engineers and owners are seeking efficient concrete solutions that conserve non-renewable resources. Global demands for regulating concrete waste arise from the growth of these environmental and economic issues. Thus, the concept of “green concrete” as an eco-friendly alternative to conventional concrete has been emerging. This publication seeks to demonstrate how concrete contributes to future generations' sustainable development, and will be of interest to policy makers, contractors and clients, as well as others involved with the design, construction or operation of buildings and infrastructure. The main objective of this study is to identify key sources contributing to CO2 emissions from concrete and compare 1) traditional concretes with green concretes, 2) concretes produced with blended cements, and 3) fly ash used as replacement of cement, in order to diminish the environmental impact of the concrete production.
Article Preview

1. Introduction

Concrete is a basic building material that will continue to be in demand far into the future. A world without concrete, and its dominant precursor, Ordinary Portland Cement (OPC), is hard to imagine. Although there are different types of concrete that have been developed for use in different applications, their common virtues are familiarity, versatility, strength, durability, wide availability, fire resistance, resistance to the elements and comparatively low cost. Global concrete industry uses approximately 1.6 billion tonnes of cement and 10 billion tonnes of sand, gravel, and crushed rock every year (Mehta, 2001). The world's yearly cement production of 1.6 billion tonnes accounts for about 7% of the global loading of carbon dioxide (CO2) into the atmosphere (Mehta, 2001).There are two major sources of GHG emissions associated with concrete production: (a) The mining, processing, and transport operations involving large quantities of aggregate consume considerable amounts of energy, produce large quantities of GHGs, and adversely affect the ecology of the areas they are extracted from. As the hauling distances between the quarries to the processing plants and processing plants to construction sites increase, GHG emissions associated with the transportation of NA also increase. (b) The manufacturing of cement involves emission of considerable amount of GHG in the atmosphere. It is estimated that producing one tonne of Portland cement requires about four giga-joules of energy, which in turn emits 1.25 tonnes of carbon dioxide into atmosphere (Wilson, 1993).

Complete Article List

Search this Journal:
Volume 8: 1 Issue (2024)
Volume 7: 1 Issue (2023)
Volume 6: 2 Issues (2022): 1 Released, 1 Forthcoming
Volume 5: 2 Issues (2021)
Volume 4: 2 Issues (2020)
Volume 3: 2 Issues (2019)
Volume 2: 2 Issues (2018)
Volume 1: 2 Issues (2017)
View Complete Journal Contents Listing