Article Preview
TopIntroduction
Marble has been used as decorative or building material since ancient times. Various archaeological marble materials of cultural heritage (e.g., statues) are frequently encountered in excavation sites amongst other finds. Thus, marble could possibly be used for dosimetric purposes in cultural applications, such as dating or authenticity test of ancient marble objects.
The suitability of luminescence techniques has been investigated for this purpose, as extensively employed to date archaeological ceramic materials and geological samples. More specifically, Thermoluminescence (TL) and Optically Stimulated Luminescence (OSL) can be used for dating marble materials (e.g., Liritzis et al., 1997; Liritzis and Galloway, 1998; Theocaris et al., 1997; Polikreti et al., 2003; Liritzis, 2010) when certain requirements/assumptions are met. More specifically, dating of marble objects (i.e., when the marble was lastly exposed to sunlight) can be accomplished providing that their (external) surface has been exposed to daylight for a long period of time before being exploited (Liritzis, 2010). Otherwise, incomplete bleaching will leave a residual dose in the material providing a highly erroneous age result if it is not subtracted from the archaeological dose (Liritzis et al., 1997). In addition, TL has also been applied in marble authenticity testing (e.g., Theocaris et al., 1997; Polikreti et al., 2002; 2003), but more effort is needed towards this direction (Polikreti, 2007).
Polikreti (2007) also notes that for any type of stone, there is no physicochemical method to ensure reliable answers to authenticity and/or dating problems, especially in the case of marble. This is attributed to the fact that marble is a geological material, thus dating techniques would give its geological age. The history of the object is recorded only at the external layer, which however is affected by numerous factors (e.g., marble type, grain size, porosity, environmental conditions, etc.). Thus, each marble surface constitutes a separate case, with its own characteristics (Polikreti, 2007).
Moreover, marble is a highly inhomogeneous metamorphic rock, which can be found in various forms and colors exhibiting different properties, strongly depending on its origin. To this respect, Khamis and Arafah (2017) made a preliminary study presenting the variations of the TL-glow-curve shape for different types of natural marble.
Based on the above, the scope of the present work is to study eleven (11) different types of natural marble of different origin (from various regions) through an integrated approach. All marble types are investigated by means of micro-X ray fluorescence spectroscopy (mXRF), stereoscopic microscopy, TL and OSL. The above measurements shed light on the similarities and variations in their chemical composition, structure/morphology and luminescence properties respectively based on their origin. Results are then assessed to further evaluate the suitability and/or the drawbacks of using natural marble as a reliable tool for dosimetric purposes in cultural applications (e.g., dating of ancient buildings or marble objects) and/or other applications (e.g., accidental dosimetry).
TopMaterials, Instruments And Methods
Eleven different types of natural marble of different origin were studied in the present work, which are presented in Table 1. Every type of marble has different characteristics, such as color, porosity, inclusions, etc.
Table 1. Marble types studied in the present work
Marble Type | Country |
Thassos White | Greece |
Naxos Crystallina White | Greece |
Dramas Pirgon White | Greece |
Stenopos Semi White | Greece |
Levadia Black | Greece |
Kavala Semi White | Greece |
Aliveri Grey | Greece |
Nestos White | Greece |
Drama Golden Spider | Greece |
Turkey Yellow Travertine | Turkey |
Indian Rainbow Forest Brown | India |