An Emergent Model of End-users' Acceptance of Enterprise Resource Planning Systems: A Grounded Theory Approach

An Emergent Model of End-users' Acceptance of Enterprise Resource Planning Systems: A Grounded Theory Approach

Fiona Fui-Hoon Nah, Xin Tan
Copyright: © 2015 |Pages: 23
DOI: 10.4018/JDM.2015100103
OnDemand:
(Individual Articles)
Available
$37.50
No Current Special Offers
TOTAL SAVINGS: $37.50

Abstract

The success of Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) implementation depends, to a large extent, on end-users' acceptance of ERP systems, which in turn affects the intensity and nature of system use. To understand the phenomenon underlying end-users' acceptance of ERP systems, the authors conducted a grounded theory research in a large institution that implemented an ERP system. Through systematic coding and content analysis, the authors inductively derived a theoretical model to explain end-users' acceptance of ERP systems. Three categories – beliefs about the system, changes in job scope, and social influence – emerged from the data as direct antecedents of user acceptance. The data also suggest that “beliefs about the system” mediates the influence of “training and support” and “personal characteristics” on user acceptance, whereas “personal characteristics” moderate the influence of “changes in job scope” on user acceptance. The theoretical model that emerged from this qualitative study extends existing models of user acceptance by providing a more complete understanding of end-users' acceptance of ERP systems.
Article Preview
Top

1. Introduction

Designed to replace disparate legacy systems and to support a full range of business functions, Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) systems integrate business processes by standardizing data, storing them in a shared database, and making the data accessible on a real time basis. Davenport (1998) characterized the embrace of ERP as the most important development in the corporate use of information technology. In the twenty-first century, adoption and implementation of ERP systems in businesses of different sizes and industries continue to grow. The worldwide ERP software market was $7.3 billion in 2000 (McAdam & Galloway, 2005) and has increased to $25.4 billion in 2013 (Columbus, 2014).

Interests in implementing ERP systems are primarily driven by their appeal as fully integrated systems that replace disparate legacy systems. In addition, adopting organizations are presumed to benefit from the best business practices embedded within ERP software packages (Davenport, 1998; Nah, Islam, & Tan, 2007; O'Leary, 2000; Sieber, Siau, Nah, & Sieber, 2000; Lee, Siau, & Hong, 2003). As the transition to ERP often involves fundamental organizational changes, the costs of implementation are generally much higher than those of other information systems projects (Hitt, Wu, & Zhou, 2002). Despite the huge investments, many ERP implementations, i.e., up to about 70% of them, fail to deliver anticipated benefits (Galy & Sauceda, 2014).

Given the growing significance of ERP projects, research that focuses on ways to improve ERP implementation is of high relevance (Robey, Ross, & Boudreau, 2002). IS researchers have identified a number of key factors that are critical to ERP implementation success (Al-Sabaawi, 2015; Barker & Frolick, 2003; Chang, Cheung, Cheng, & Yeung, 2008; Hong & Kim, 2002; Nah & Delgado, 2006; Nah, Lau, & Kuang, 2001; Nah, Zuckweiler, & Lau, 2003; Ngai, Law, & Wat, 2008; Ram & Corkindale, 2014; Scott & Vessey, 2002; Siau, 2004; Wah, 2000). While many key success factors address organizational level issues such as management support, change management, and communication, the ultimate goal is to have the functional potential of the ERP systems fully realized by users. In other words, the true business value of an ERP system is derived through appropriate use by its target user groups.

Complete Article List

Search this Journal:
Reset
Volume 35: 1 Issue (2024)
Volume 34: 3 Issues (2023)
Volume 33: 5 Issues (2022): 4 Released, 1 Forthcoming
Volume 32: 4 Issues (2021)
Volume 31: 4 Issues (2020)
Volume 30: 4 Issues (2019)
Volume 29: 4 Issues (2018)
Volume 28: 4 Issues (2017)
Volume 27: 4 Issues (2016)
Volume 26: 4 Issues (2015)
Volume 25: 4 Issues (2014)
Volume 24: 4 Issues (2013)
Volume 23: 4 Issues (2012)
Volume 22: 4 Issues (2011)
Volume 21: 4 Issues (2010)
Volume 20: 4 Issues (2009)
Volume 19: 4 Issues (2008)
Volume 18: 4 Issues (2007)
Volume 17: 4 Issues (2006)
Volume 16: 4 Issues (2005)
Volume 15: 4 Issues (2004)
Volume 14: 4 Issues (2003)
Volume 13: 4 Issues (2002)
Volume 12: 4 Issues (2001)
Volume 11: 4 Issues (2000)
Volume 10: 4 Issues (1999)
Volume 9: 4 Issues (1998)
Volume 8: 4 Issues (1997)
Volume 7: 4 Issues (1996)
Volume 6: 4 Issues (1995)
Volume 5: 4 Issues (1994)
Volume 4: 4 Issues (1993)
Volume 3: 4 Issues (1992)
Volume 2: 4 Issues (1991)
Volume 1: 2 Issues (1990)
View Complete Journal Contents Listing