Brain Electrical Oscillation Signature Profiling (BEOS)

Brain Electrical Oscillation Signature Profiling (BEOS)

Vishal Kumar Parmar (Institute of Behavioral Science, Gujarat Forensic Sciences University, Ahmedabad, India) and C. R. Mukundan (Axxonet Brain Research Laboratory, Axxonet System Technology, Bangalore, India)
Copyright: © 2017 |Pages: 24
DOI: 10.4018/IJCCP.2017010101
OnDemand PDF Download:
$30.00
List Price: $37.50

Abstract

This article shows the development of techniques for deception detection has reached a stage of extreme complexity as the information sought must be extracted from the brain of suspects, instead of making inferences about it from the emotional effects produced during the traditional lie detection tests. This includes the presentation of concealed information and oral or behavioral responses by the individual are necessary requirements for use of these techniques. The new technique described here extracts information directly from memory, without having the individual respond to the statements - probes presented. It measures the components of electrical oscillations generated during remembrance of autobiographical episodes, which can occur only when one has acquired the experiences through participation in the said activities.
Article Preview

Introduction

Retrieval of information from memory takes place for two different processing requirements. One for recognition of the entities of the external world, which must happen rapidly as the individual’s efficiency to deal with the world depends on quick detection of the changes in the world. The other retrieval is related to remembrance of autobiographical episodes, which are experiences of the individual. Several studies have shown the involvement of different neural structures during the activation of the two retrieval processes. The process of recognition of an external stimulus is associated with several signal-processing stages viz., sensory registration, arousal of attention followed by detection of the stimulus.

The neurocognitive processes are best represented by electrophysiological changes in the brain, which can be easily recorded using surface electrodes placed on the head (Mukundan, 1986a, 1986b, 1995; Khanna et al., 1989; Mukundan et al., 1989, 1990). Of these stages, the detection or recognition of the stimulus is accompanied by the P300 event related potential (Donchin, 1981; Neville et al., 1986; Donchin and Coles, 1988; Annet & Mukundan, 1996; Mukundan & Rohrbaugh, 1998; Sudha & Mukundan, 1998; Mukundan et al., 1999; Silva et al., 2007). However, the P300 response can be produced only presentation of a brief stimulus lasting not more than 200 ms. The P300 response represents the detection or recognition of a new stimulus and the amplitude of the potential is a function of the special or change in the meaning, unexpected familiarity, or novelty in the stimulus. The P300 potential can be produced by the infrequent stimulus in an oddball paradigm consisting of two stimuli one frequently and the other infrequently presented, every stimulus when a set of different stimuli (Mukundan & Rohrbaugh, 1998) are presented one after the other, or when the same stimulus is presented with varying intertrial interval (Gonsalvez et al., 1995, 1999, 2002, 2007; Mertens & Polich, 1997; Polich & Heine, 1996; Polich et al., 1994).

Complete Article List

Search this Journal:
Reset
Open Access Articles: Forthcoming
Volume 2: 2 Issues (2017): 1 Released, 1 Forthcoming
Volume 1: 2 Issues (2016)
View Complete Journal Contents Listing