Exploring the Social Dynamics of Implementing Self-Managed Web-Based Wellness Tools: A Structuration Analysis

Exploring the Social Dynamics of Implementing Self-Managed Web-Based Wellness Tools: A Structuration Analysis

Rennie Naidoo
DOI: 10.4018/jhisi.2012100102
OnDemand:
(Individual Articles)
Available
$37.50
No Current Special Offers
TOTAL SAVINGS: $37.50

Abstract

According to proponents of consumer-driven healthcare, the Web continues to offer huge opportunities to empower consumers to take individual ownership over their healthcare. Consequently many healthcare insurance service providers are integrating elements of Wellness into their product and service design and are making these available through Web-based portals. Based on a longitudinal case study of an e-Wellness implementation at a multinational consumer-driven healthcare insurance firm, key concepts from structuration theory are used to explore and analyse the social dynamics involved in the implementation of these contemporary forms of healthcare service encounters. This case study reports that in this particular context, face-to-face consultations continue to prevail over the use of virtual diagnosis and treatment by a computer-meditated virtual stress therapist and dietician practitioner. The author proposes the use of social frameworks to analyse and better understand the intricacies involved in implementing Wellness innovations.
Article Preview
Top

Introduction

“Whether one is engaging in a health promoting activity such as exercise or is living with a chronic disease such as asthma, he or she is responsible for day-to-day management… The issue of self management is especially important for those with chronic disease, where only the patient can be responsible for his or her day-to-day care over the length of the illness.” (Lorig & Holman, 2003)

Many healthcare insurance firms model their business on the so-called consumer-driven healthcare concept. Healthcare insurance firms frame this emerging concept as one in which their clients are empowered to play a greater role in decisions about their healthcare; have better access to information to make informed decisions; and share more in the costs (Scheffler & Felton, 2006; Cannon & Tanner, 2005; Abbott & Feltman, 2002).

Web 2.0 technologies represent a ground-breaking way of more effectively repurposing healthcare information to facilitate such a relationship as compared to the traditional Web 1.0 model. In the near future, proponents of the Web suggest that software based on Web 3.0 (the Semantic Web) will produce an even more definitive ‘architecture of participation’ between healthcare service providers and their customers (O’Reilly, 2003; Agha, 2006). Many consumer driven healthcare organizations are also looking to draw on the ‘social Web’ to foster deeper, more meaningful conversations and interactions with their customers through greater levels of personalization (Netmesh, 2006; Skiba, 2006). Healthcare services are also increasingly using multi-interface information systems which are raising new challenges in the area of Information Systems (IS) implementation and use. According to Rayport and Jaworski (2005), these service channels, can be defined as ‘‘any place at which a company seeks to manage a relationship with a customer, whether through people, technology, or some combination of both.’’

One potentially important innovation in consumer-driven healthcare (CDH) is the use of self-managed Web-based Wellness tools. Customers are encouraged to use recent advances in preventative tools and content, related to health and lifestyle combined with reward schemes, to improve and enhance their health and reduce the cost of healthcare. A dominant view among proponents of CDH is that Web-based online applications provide an inexpensive platform for sharing information (Laing, Hogg, & Winkleman, 2004). This view also proposes that computerisation would make it possible to provide real-time clinical decisions and support patient care via the Internet. Many healthcare insurance firms globally are actively experimenting and adapting their strategies and business practices to take advantage of these potential opportunities. Yet, despite the overall optimism on using the Internet, healthcare users have generally lagged in the adoption and use of online self-help health resources (Gummerus, Liljander, Pura, & Van Riel, 2004).

Complete Article List

Search this Journal:
Reset
Volume 19: 1 Issue (2024)
Volume 18: 1 Issue (2023)
Volume 17: 2 Issues (2022)
Volume 16: 4 Issues (2021)
Volume 15: 4 Issues (2020)
Volume 14: 4 Issues (2019)
Volume 13: 4 Issues (2018)
Volume 12: 4 Issues (2017)
Volume 11: 4 Issues (2016)
Volume 10: 4 Issues (2015)
Volume 9: 4 Issues (2014)
Volume 8: 4 Issues (2013)
Volume 7: 4 Issues (2012)
Volume 6: 4 Issues (2011)
Volume 5: 4 Issues (2010)
Volume 4: 4 Issues (2009)
Volume 3: 4 Issues (2008)
Volume 2: 4 Issues (2007)
Volume 1: 4 Issues (2006)
View Complete Journal Contents Listing