Homogenization of Japanese Industrial Technology From the Perspective of R&D Expenses

Homogenization of Japanese Industrial Technology From the Perspective of R&D Expenses

Hirokazu Yamada
Copyright: © 2021 |Pages: 28
DOI: 10.4018/IJSSOE.2021070102
OnDemand:
(Individual Articles)
Available
$37.50
No Current Special Offers
TOTAL SAVINGS: $37.50

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to discuss the reasons for the decline in the profitability of Japanese R&D from the perspective of in-house R&D efforts. Focusing on changes in the allocation ratio of in-house R&D expenses by industry from 1972 to 2017, technological structure changes in the Japanese industry during that period are empirically analyzed. Based on the analysis, the technological structure of the Japanese industry has been consistently moving toward homogenization since 1972. Homogenization is mainly directed toward the related technical fields of automobiles and information and communication machinery/equipment/electronic parts, which are the main industries that currently lead the Japanese economy. While the types of technical knowledge possessed by the Japanese industry are decreasing, there is a lack of R&D activities that will create new products and markets and increase the pie of the Japanese industry or greatly promote the metabolism of technology of the entire industry.
Article Preview
Top

Introduction

The players who promote Japanese research and development (R&D) are generally companies, universities, and governments—wherein companies play a central role in this. Companies pursue private profits, and promoting R&D is an important issue for them. Companies must create technology internally, acquire it externally, or use a combination of both to develop new technology and connect it to private profits. It is meaningful to discuss the main factors of R&D issues, such as “it is difficult to produce original and new results” and “excellent technological results do not lead to profits.” In this study, to empirically grasp the current state of companies’ internal R&D efforts, the expenses used mainly to support the internal R&D activities for technological creation are analyzed. Yamada (2018, 2019, 2020) reveals that R&D in-house expenditures do not contribute to corporate profits.

Focusing on the changes in the allocation ratio of R&D in-house expenses from 1972 to 2017, technological structure changes within the Japanese industry during that period are clarified. By doing so, the author will consider the reasons for the decline in Japanese R&D profitability. In this paper, changes in the technological structure refer to whether the technical knowledge possessed by the industry is diversifying or homogenizing. Consolidation means that R&D investment is concentrated in a particular technical field, and homogenization implies that the types of technical knowledge are reduced by consolidation. If the technical structure is homogenized, the author clarifies which technical areas are concentrated. The allocation of R&D expenses in a company is determined according to the business policy of the company. In other words, changes in the distribution of R&D expenses reflect management decisions. Industry-based R&D allocation indicates the area of research focused on by the industry. In addition, the allocation changes over time show the difference in the degree of concentration of the industry in the relevant research fields. This study derives data from the Ministry of Internal Affairs and Communications annual “Science and Technology Research Report” article titled “In-house research expenses by industry, product/service field (companies with capital of 100 million yen or more).” The distribution ratio of R&D expenses is calculated based on the technical field, and changes in the technological structure from 1972 to 2017 are empirically analyzed. Japanese R&D profitability is declining, and this study determines the reasons for this decline to improve profitability.

Complete Article List

Search this Journal:
Reset
Volume 13: 1 Issue (2024): Forthcoming, Available for Pre-Order
Volume 12: 2 Issues (2022): 1 Released, 1 Forthcoming
Volume 11: 2 Issues (2021)
Volume 10: 2 Issues (2020)
Volume 9: 2 Issues (2019)
Volume 8: 4 Issues (2018)
Volume 7: 4 Issues (2017)
Volume 6: 4 Issues (2016)
Volume 5: 4 Issues (2015)
Volume 4: 4 Issues (2014)
Volume 3: 4 Issues (2012)
Volume 2: 4 Issues (2011)
Volume 1: 4 Issues (2010)
View Complete Journal Contents Listing