Merging Controlled Vocabularies for More Efficient Subject-Based IR Systems

Merging Controlled Vocabularies for More Efficient Subject-Based IR Systems

Ioannis Papadakis (University of Ionio, Greece) and Konstantinos Kyprianos (University of Ionio, Greece)
Copyright: © 2011 |Pages: 17
DOI: 10.4018/jkm.2011070106
OnDemand PDF Download:
$30.00
List Price: $37.50

Abstract

One of the most important tasks of a librarian is the assignment of appropriate subject(s) to a resource within a library’s collection. The subjects usually belong to a controlled vocabulary that is specifically designed for such a task. The most widely adopted controlled vocabulary across libraries around the world is the Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH). However, there seems to be a shifting from traditional LCSH to modern thesauri. In this paper, a methodology is proposed, capable of incorporating thesauri into existing LCSH-based Information Retrieval–IR systems. In order to achieve this, a mapping methodology is proposed capable of providing a common structure consisting of terms belonging to LCSH and/or a thesaurus. The structure is modeled as a Simple Knowledge Organization System (SKOS) ontology, which can be employed by appropriate subject-based IR systems. As a proof of concept, the proposed methodology is applied to the DSpace-based University of Piraeus digital library.
Article Preview

2. Lcsh And Thesauri As Controlled Vocabularies For Pre- And Post- Coordinated Subject-Based Ir Systems

As stated in Harper and Tillett (2007), there are various types of controlled vocabularies concerning the assignment of values to the “subject” metadata element. LCSH and thesauri seem to be the predominant options for such a task.

According to the LCSH guidelines (Library of Congress, 2007), subjects employ verbal strings for the description of the resources within a repository. They, also, define relations between these strings in order to demonstrate the synonyms and the associations between the subjects. A subject consists of the main heading, which corresponds to the prevalent concept of the resource. In case of resources adhering to more specific concepts, the main heading can be further specialized with subdivisions. Such subdivisions represent various aspects of the main heading. There are four types of subdivisions according to the LCSH guidelines; topical, form, geographical and chronological subdivisions. The LCSH guidelines impose certain restrictions concerning the order of subdivisions within a subject. More specifically, such order normally conforms to the pattern 'topic-place-time-form':

  • [main heading] -- [topical subdivision] -- [geographical subdivision]

  • --[chronological subdivision] -- [form subdivision]

Complete Article List

Search this Journal:
Reset
Open Access Articles
Volume 13: 4 Issues (2017): 3 Released, 1 Forthcoming
Volume 12: 4 Issues (2016)
Volume 11: 4 Issues (2015)
Volume 10: 4 Issues (2014)
Volume 9: 4 Issues (2013)
Volume 8: 4 Issues (2012)
Volume 7: 4 Issues (2011)
Volume 6: 4 Issues (2010)
Volume 5: 4 Issues (2009)
Volume 4: 4 Issues (2008)
Volume 3: 4 Issues (2007)
Volume 2: 4 Issues (2006)
Volume 1: 4 Issues (2005)
View Complete Journal Contents Listing