Nudge: A Bridge Between Choice and Desired Decision

Nudge: A Bridge Between Choice and Desired Decision

Vikas Pujara, Bhavesh Prakash Joshi, Charu Virmani
Copyright: © 2022 |Pages: 15
DOI: 10.4018/IJABE.302140
Article PDF Download
Open access articles are freely available for download

Abstract

The "Real" decision often varies from the "Rational" decision. The Real or the actual behaviour of people is quite often biased and differs from the rational decision framework which has been put in place by classical economics. The irrational or undesired behaviour displayed by the people even in an informed public policy is a classic example of this. The purpose of this paper is to try and explain the classical nudge theory which ‘nudge’ the people towards a desirable behaviour. We need to contemplate if we could use it as a method to awaken the motivate us Indians to invest or if it could help us to devise policy or the marketing campaigns in such an effective manner that it could help us bridge the gap of non-investment behaviour. Researcher has considered the 6 Nudge principles to prepare a questionnaire which has been duly filled online by 135 respondents. It has been shown that there is an impact of Nidge as a decision making tool for policy formation.
Article Preview
Top

Introduction

In designing a public policy (Alcott, H., and S. Mullainathan, 2010), the behavior of citizens has commonly been modeled under the assumption of rationality, digging more into the research has proven that human beings are not rational decision-makers. The decisions are made on several governing factors like basis the events, situations, and ability to handle them affects the decisions made by an individual which can be taken in considerations to help and empower an individual to make better choices.

To help improve an individual’s decision-making (Thaler, 2013) and influencing positive behavior, there is a concept in behavioral science, political theory, and behavioral economics called nudge. Everyone sometimes acts against their self-interest which is described by Nobel Laureate Daniel Kahneman as two distinct systems for processing information (Tversky, A. and D. Kahneman, 1974):

  • System 1: Fast, automatic, and highly susceptible often used while time constraints or judgmental heuristics for faster resolution.

  • System 2: Slow, reflective, and usually accountable for explicit goals.

It has also described as maladaptive behavior by Thaler and Sunstein where system 1 overrides the explicit goals which explain that human habitual behavior (Thaler, 2000) doesn’t change without causing a disruption that triggers the behavior as per the surroundings.

Nuding is a concept of behavioral science that talks about indirect suggestions which could influence the thought process and decision-making ability of an individual or group (Thaler, Richard H, and C. R. Sunstein, 2008). The judgmental heuristic often aims the nudging technique to the advantage of creating a set of choices (Baumeister Et. al., 2001). E.g.: If there is a faster and reliable choice, the outcome would be more positive like a food chain store's choice of delivering ready-made food or the fruits provided a healthier option is ready to eat with faster service and delivery.

Cognitive biases is the term in psychology and behavioral economics that talks about systematic patterns of deviation. Biases impacting investment decisions (Barber & Odeon, 2001) are as follows:

Complete Article List

Search this Journal:
Reset
Volume 13: 1 Issue (2024): Forthcoming, Available for Pre-Order
Volume 12: 1 Issue (2023)
Volume 11: 1 Issue (2022)
Volume 10: 4 Issues (2021)
Volume 9: 4 Issues (2020)
Volume 8: 4 Issues (2019)
Volume 7: 4 Issues (2018)
Volume 6: 4 Issues (2017)
Volume 5: 4 Issues (2016)
Volume 4: 4 Issues (2015)
Volume 3: 4 Issues (2014)
Volume 2: 4 Issues (2013)
Volume 1: 4 Issues (2012)
View Complete Journal Contents Listing