Predicting User Satisfaction of Mobile Healthcare Services Using Machine Learning: Confronting the COVID-19 Pandemic

Predicting User Satisfaction of Mobile Healthcare Services Using Machine Learning: Confronting the COVID-19 Pandemic

Haein Lee, Seon Hong Lee, Dongyan Nan, Jang Hyun Kim
Copyright: © 2022 |Pages: 17
DOI: 10.4018/JOEUC.300766
Article PDF Download
Open access articles are freely available for download

Abstract

The outbreak of COVID-19 led to rapid development of the mobile healthcare services. Given that user satisfaction is of great significance in inducing marketing success in competition markets, this research explores and predicts user satisfaction with mobile healthcare services. Specifically, the current research aimed to design a machine learning model that predicts user satisfaction with healthcare services using big data from Google Play Store reviews and satisfaction ratings. By dealing with the sentimental features in online reviews with five classifiers, the authors find that logistic regression with term frequency-inverse document frequency (TF-IDF) and XGBoost with bag of words (BoW) have superior performances in predicting user satisfaction for healthcare services. Based on these results, the authors conclude that such user-generated texts as online reviews can be used to predict user satisfaction, and logistic regression with TF-IDF and XGBoost with BoW can be prioritized for developing online review analysis platforms for healthcare service providers.
Article Preview
Top

Introduction

Along with the global spread of COVID-19, people's demands for a healthy lifestyle have enhanced rapidly since 2019. Due to the recommendations of the World Health Organization (WHO) (Jones et al., 2020) on maintaining physical distance, healthcare-related services cannot provide face-to-face services. Countering this situation, several companies have been striving to provide mobile technology-based healthcare services (i.e., mobile healthcare service) to individuals who desire to take care of their health. Because mobile healthcare services do not require face-to-face communication, the services are suitable for the Covid-19 environment and have attracted a large number of users (Ming et al., 2020).

Mobile healthcare service is conceptualized as a system that offers health-related information and services via mobile communication technologies (e.g., smart phones and mobile networks) (Jaiswal and Anand, 2021; Zhao et al., 2018). Owing to the immense contribution to big data technology and artificial intelligence in recent times, mobile healthcare services can adequately trace the health condition of their users, and offer timely treatment and care (Zhao et al., 2018; Bol et al., 2018; Saheb, 2020). Mobile healthcare services not only save diagnosis time and cost but also play a positive role to improve the efficiency of medical resources (Lin et al., 2021). Therefore, a number of countries (e.g., Korea, China, and United States) have been taking efforts to support the development of mobile healthcare services (Zhao et al., 2018). Additionally, many people have been attracted by the advantages of mobile healthcare services and have resorted in their daily usage (Ming et al., 2020). As of 2021, more than 400,000 mobile healthcare applications have been made available on the Google play store (Imaginovation, 2021). According to Global market insights (2021), the global mobile health market has been estimated to reach $289.4 billion by 2025.

Considering user satisfaction as being related to user loyalty and the intention to use specific technologies continuously (Bhattacherjee, 2001; Kumar et al., 2013; Cheng and Jiang, 2020), several studies have explored the user experience elements that lead to greater user satisfaction with mobile healthcare services (e.g., Oppong et al., 2021; Handayani et al., 2018; Keikhosrokiani et al., 2020). However, most studies exploring the user experience of mobile healthcare services only employed a small number of samples and traditional methodologies (e.g., analyzing small survey-based data with structural equation model). Therefore, to solve these shortcomings, this research attempts to predict and explore user satisfaction with mobile healthcare services by examining big data using machine learning approaches.

Specifically, 139,604 usable online reviews of a particular mobile healthcare service (i.e., Samsung Health) from Google Play store were collected. Subsequently, five machine learning classifiers (i.e., Logistic regression, Random Forest, Gradient Boosting Model, Extreme Gradient Boosting, Naïve Bayes) with three word embedding methods (Bag-of-words (BoW), Term Frequency - Inverse Document Frequency (TF-IDF), Global Vectors for Word Representation (GloVe)) for predicting user satisfaction with healthcare services were applied. It is worth noting that, this is one of the first studies to predict user satisfaction by employing big data and machine learning approaches in the mobile healthcare service field. Theoretically, this study also can contribute to expanding the literature of affect theory (Kratzwald et al., 2018) which indicates that user-generated contents are notably related to user satisfaction with certain services and products.

Complete Article List

Search this Journal:
Reset
Volume 36: 1 Issue (2024)
Volume 35: 3 Issues (2023)
Volume 34: 10 Issues (2022)
Volume 33: 6 Issues (2021)
Volume 32: 4 Issues (2020)
Volume 31: 4 Issues (2019)
Volume 30: 4 Issues (2018)
Volume 29: 4 Issues (2017)
Volume 28: 4 Issues (2016)
Volume 27: 4 Issues (2015)
Volume 26: 4 Issues (2014)
Volume 25: 4 Issues (2013)
Volume 24: 4 Issues (2012)
Volume 23: 4 Issues (2011)
Volume 22: 4 Issues (2010)
Volume 21: 4 Issues (2009)
Volume 20: 4 Issues (2008)
Volume 19: 4 Issues (2007)
Volume 18: 4 Issues (2006)
Volume 17: 4 Issues (2005)
Volume 16: 4 Issues (2004)
Volume 15: 4 Issues (2003)
Volume 14: 4 Issues (2002)
Volume 13: 4 Issues (2001)
Volume 12: 4 Issues (2000)
Volume 11: 4 Issues (1999)
Volume 10: 4 Issues (1998)
Volume 9: 4 Issues (1997)
Volume 8: 4 Issues (1996)
Volume 7: 4 Issues (1995)
Volume 6: 4 Issues (1994)
Volume 5: 4 Issues (1993)
Volume 4: 4 Issues (1992)
Volume 3: 4 Issues (1991)
Volume 2: 4 Issues (1990)
Volume 1: 3 Issues (1989)
View Complete Journal Contents Listing