Research on a New Reconstruction Technology and Evaluation Method for 3D Digital Core Pore Structure

Research on a New Reconstruction Technology and Evaluation Method for 3D Digital Core Pore Structure

Feinan Cheng
Copyright: © 2023 |Pages: 15
DOI: 10.4018/IJWSR.329597
Article PDF Download
Open access articles are freely available for download

Abstract

This study analyses the main techniques for constructing a three-dimensional (3D) digital core, and summarizes the advantages and disadvantages of each reconstruction technique. The direction for the development of reconstruction technology for 3D digital cores is also proposed. The integration of multiscale, multicomponent, and nanoscale technology under different resolutions will play a significant role in future research efforts surrounding the physical properties of 3D digital cores. This study also introduces the main evaluation methods of digital cores, while analyzing and comparing the applicable scenarios of each method. The results of the pore statistics method, based on the seed filling algorithm, can be used as a new and effective evaluation method for the 3D reconstruction of digital cores.
Article Preview
Top

Digital Core Reconstruction Technology

Digital Core Reconstruction Method

Digital core reconstruction technology includes a method of physical experimentation and a method of numerical reconstruction (Zhu et al., 2018). Physical experimentation generally involves scanning the core with a high-resolution electron microscope, obtaining information through image processing technology, and directly reconstructing a 3D digital core (Yang et al., 2016). Three physical experimentation methods exist, each utilizing different instruments: sequence imaging, CT scanning, and FIB-SEM. The advantage of the physical experimentation method is that it can use a high-resolution SEM to establish a sufficiently accurate digital core; its disadvantage is that the instrument used is expensive, and the experimental process is tedious and time-consuming (Hazlett, 1997). The numerical reconstruction methods are divided into random, process, and random-process methods. Conventional methods include the complete random, random growth, Gaussian simulation, simulated annealing, multipoint statistics, Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC), and process simulation methods (Bostanabad et al., 2018; Quiblier, 1984). The mixed element method combines two numerical reconstruction methods, such as the Gaussian-simulated annealing method and the process-simulated annealing method (Okabe & Blunt, 2004).

Complete Article List

Search this Journal:
Reset
Volume 21: 1 Issue (2024)
Volume 20: 1 Issue (2023)
Volume 19: 4 Issues (2022): 1 Released, 3 Forthcoming
Volume 18: 4 Issues (2021)
Volume 17: 4 Issues (2020)
Volume 16: 4 Issues (2019)
Volume 15: 4 Issues (2018)
Volume 14: 4 Issues (2017)
Volume 13: 4 Issues (2016)
Volume 12: 4 Issues (2015)
Volume 11: 4 Issues (2014)
Volume 10: 4 Issues (2013)
Volume 9: 4 Issues (2012)
Volume 8: 4 Issues (2011)
Volume 7: 4 Issues (2010)
Volume 6: 4 Issues (2009)
Volume 5: 4 Issues (2008)
Volume 4: 4 Issues (2007)
Volume 3: 4 Issues (2006)
Volume 2: 4 Issues (2005)
Volume 1: 4 Issues (2004)
View Complete Journal Contents Listing