Article Preview
TopIntroduction
In the global race for more intuitive interfaces that must allow non-expert users to operate on increasingly complex technology, we explored 3D Virtual Environments (3DVEs). We focused on the role of emotions in the design and use of such interfaces, by developing a method to design affective interaction with 3DVEs. This is related to the problem of how to manage the user’s emotional level as a User-Centred Evaluation (UCE) activity. In this context, the efficiency of the emotion recognition method is the main factor affecting the research outcome.
Traditional methods, such as self-report or interviews, are not ideal: they rely either on sampling approaches or the user's perception of the environment. Also traditional methods for capturing the interaction experience in an unconscious and continuous approach (e.g. log experience) may be troublesome, as they do not collect subjective feedback from (potential) users.
We chose Brain-Computer Interface (BCIs, (van Gerven, 2009)) as a way to investigate the emotional activity of a subject beyond his conscious and controllable behavior (Bos, 2007; Choppin, 2000; Murugappan et al., 2008). By employing BCI we tried to overcome the cited weaknesses of traditional methods for assessing the user's (emotional) experience.
In this paper, the design of a 3D virtual environment (3DVE) is presented as a way to elicit and synthesize complex user emotions. A 3DVE is one of the most representative examples of an emotional adaptive virtual environment (EAVE). Because it is adaptive, the more the system knows about the user’s detailed emotions, the better it can react by guiding them along well-defined emotional and informative paths (Leite et al., 2010).
Concerning the evaluation of the selected environment, we manage the user’s emotional level by performing (i) formative usability tests, in order to guide the designer in organizing the user-system dialog, according to the potential emotional activity of users. This is linked to the possibility of implementing the opportune interface to collect additional information on the user’s needs and preferences; (ii) summative usability tests, in order to evaluate the user-system dialog, in terms of dynamic increase of the emotionally-driven interaction customization. This is linked to the possibility of using real-time acquisition of information about the emotional state of the user to adapt the characteristics of the interaction, to reach the intended emotional effects on each individual user better.