Academic Service-Learning as a Pedagogical Tool and Strategy: Promoting Critical Thinking Among Pre-Service Teachers

Academic Service-Learning as a Pedagogical Tool and Strategy: Promoting Critical Thinking Among Pre-Service Teachers

Estanislado S. Barrera, IV (Louisiana State University, USA) and Margaret-Mary Sulentic Dowell (Louisiana State University, USA)
DOI: 10.4018/978-1-5225-7305-0.ch023
OnDemand PDF Download:
No Current Special Offers


This chapter presents academic service-learning (AS-L) as a pedagogical tool and strategy for promoting critical thinking among pre-service teachers. The results of the two cases discussed reveal that many well-intentioned young education majors' frames of reference about urban education indicate a dissonance of experience. Public urban education in the US is becoming increasingly stratified with teachers representing White, female, middle income backgrounds and resultant perspectives, but public school children in the United States represent families of color and communities that are predominantly poor. AS-L truly promotes critical thinking about teaching and learning, especially when the tensions surrounding difference surface. Findings indicate that pre-service teachers must first overcome bias, negative expectations, and stereotypes before they synthesize the elements of the instructional process that leads to achieving reflective praxis.
Chapter Preview

Theoretical Framework

For the purpose of this study, we turned to Kolb’s (1984) experiential learning theory to guide our research. Building on Dewey’s (1910, 1916, 1933) work, Kolb’s (1984) model outlines how learning involves the translation of experiences through the process of reflection into understanding, which is then applied through active experimentation in the form of new experiences (See Figure 1). Zuber-Skerritt (1992), found it to be a “comprehensive theory which offers the foundation for an approach to education and learning as a lifelong process and which is soundly based in intellectual traditions of philosophy and cognitive and social psychology” (p. 98). Highlighting the significance of reflection, Anderson and Adams (1992) supported that Kolb’s theory “is rooted in a theory of learning that affirms all major aspects of active learning, usefully accounting for an array of individual and culturally derived differences” (p. 25).

Figure 1.

Kolb’s Experiential Learning Process.


Complete Chapter List

Search this Book: