Black Opportunity Entrepreneurship Post-Pandemic Outcomes

Black Opportunity Entrepreneurship Post-Pandemic Outcomes

Micah E. S. Crump, Nicholas J. Hill, Jo-Ann Rolle
DOI: 10.4018/978-1-6684-6990-3.ch011
OnDemand:
(Individual Chapters)
Available
$37.50
No Current Special Offers
TOTAL SAVINGS: $37.50

Abstract

The authors use Kauffman Early-Stage Entrepreneurship (KESE) index data of 25 years, to analyze a sample of 42,688 entrepreneurs to make demographic comparisons of black and woman entrepreneurs to others. The study expands on recent research and illustrates that the number of US entrepreneurs who are opportunity-entrepreneurs, declined over the past 25 years. Opportunity-based entrepreneurship yields more favorable economic outcomes than necessity-based entrepreneurship. Logistic analysis is used to compare odds ratios of many demographic groups of entrepreneurs. The study provides added education, age, income, and marriage status comparisons of black entrepreneurs in the US in how they are faring with respect to others. The authors find support for ten of the fourteen hypotheses they test for in their analysis. In conclusion, the report identifies outcomes for black entrepreneurs, and also offers practical implications and promising recommendations to educators.
Chapter Preview
Top

Introduction

Opportunity Entrepreneurship

Scholars have long asserted that opportunity recognition is an essential and critical first step of the entrepreneurship process (Bygrave, 1989a, 1989b; Christensen et al., 1994; Hills, G., 1995; Shane and Venkataraman, 2000; Stevenson et al.,1989; Stevenson & Jarillo-Mossi, 1986). Two different types of opportunity recognition exist: externally-stimulated opportunity recognition, and internally-stimulated opportunity recognition (Bhave, 1994; Cyert & March, 1963). In externally-stimulated opportunity recognition, entrepreneurs first decide to become an entrepreneur, and only after making that decision do they search for and discover an entrepreneurial opportunity. In contrast, internally-stimulated opportunity recognition begins with a person discovering an unsolved market problem or unmet need, and only after discovery does the person decide to create a new business venture to address that unresolved market need (Bhave, 1994; Cyert & March, 1963). Entrepreneurial ventures formed through internally stimulated opportunity recognition produce higher revenue projections than externally stimulated opportunity recognition ventures (Singh & Hills, 2003). Entrepreneurs who pursue internally-stimulated opportunities are also more highly educated and contain higher net worth than those who pursue externally-stimulated opportunities (Singh & Hills, 2003).

Necessity-Based vs. Opportunity-Based Entrepreneurship

What motivates people to become entrepreneurs and business owners differ. With necessity-based entrepreneurship, people become entrepreneurs to generate income for subsistence purposes (Gibbs, Mahone, & Crump, 2014; Raijman, 2001; Reynolds et al., 2004; Sassen, 1997). Thus, necessity-based entrepreneurs engage in externally stimulated opportunity recognition. In opportunity-based entrepreneurship, people become entrepreneurs primarily because they have discovered some business opportunity they now wish to pursue (Snyder, 2004; Edgcomb & Thetford, 2004; Williams, 2011).

When people struggle economically, out of necessity, often they decide to start a business. When people who are secure in their abilities to generate suitable income decide to start a business, they most often start opportunity-based businesses. Necessity-based businesses are often micro-businesses that are extremely small in scale, run by one person along with the assistance of family and household members, and run informally (DeJaeghere & Baxter, 2014; Libombo & Dinis, 2015). As the percentage of income insecure people in a particular region outpaces those who are income secure, the percentage of people who start opportunity-based businesses in that region will decrease. In response to macro-economic trends in wealth transference in the United States which leads to an increasing mass of an economically struggling population, one should expect that the percentage of opportunity-based entrepreneurs in the US has decreased over the past 25 years.

Complete Chapter List

Search this Book:
Reset