DACtivism: Debate Across the Curriculum for Teaching as Activism

DACtivism: Debate Across the Curriculum for Teaching as Activism

Copyright: © 2024 |Pages: 21
DOI: 10.4018/979-8-3693-0537-9.ch006
OnDemand:
(Individual Chapters)
Available
$37.50
No Current Special Offers
TOTAL SAVINGS: $37.50

Abstract

Academic debate, as an interscholastic and intercollegiate competition in which competitors engage in argumentation on topics of politics, philosophy and social life, has a long-history in education. Debate across the curriculum (DAC) has been advocated as a way to incorporate the activities of academic debate into the classroom for the purpose of increasing student engagement and improving student learning outcomes. The pedagogical tools of DAC align both with teaching as activism and the recognition that effective social justice advocacy requires the critical thinking, media literacy, and rhetorical skills that are facilitated when DAC concepts are applied in the classroom. In this chapter, the foundations of DAC are outlined, with particular attention to how the pedagogical use of debate activities establishes a classroom culture that empowers students to take control of their education.
Chapter Preview

“I think debating in high school and college a most valuable training…The give and take of debating, the testing of ideas, is essential to democracy.”

- President John F Kennedy (quoted in Fisher, p.12)

Top

Background On Academic Debate

The use of debate as a pedagogical tool is generally credited to the Greek sophist, Protagoras, the ‘father of debate’ (Payne). But in terms of format, the origins of academic debate as we now know it are more accurately attributed to Great Britain in the 19th century. What began in a decentralized and less organized manner ultimately developed into the British Debating Societies of the 1880s (Haapala). The stated purpose of these societies was to bring awareness of political, moral, and religious issues in Britain in a way that was accessible to the average citizen by having participants rely on their speaking skills, a significant format development given that debate of issues at the time were largely conducted via the written word (Haapala). The founders of these debating societies believed that “oratorical practice would benefit” the participants, “enriching our judgment, brightening our wit, and enlarging our knowledge and of being serviceable to others in the same things” (Samuels, p. 204). It was common for hundreds to attend these meetings, with topics chosen beforehand and time allocations agreed upon for each speech (Fawcett).

Complete Chapter List

Search this Book:
Reset