Finite Wing Theory

Finite Wing Theory

Madhankumar G., Mothilal T., Kumar K. M., Muralidharan G., Mala D.
DOI: 10.4018/978-1-6684-4230-2.ch005
OnDemand:
(Individual Chapters)
Available
$37.50
No Current Special Offers
TOTAL SAVINGS: $37.50

Abstract

Wing design is a very complicated and intricate issue. It is not feasible to cover everything in this chapter; however, it is possible to discuss some of the essential ideas that underpin design for high lift and low drag. Lift may be increased in four ways for fixed air characteristics and free-stream speed: increased wing area, increased angle of attack, increased camber, increased circulation through the use of high-momentum fluid. One of the most important applications of potential flow theory was the study of lifting surfaces such as aircraft wings, since the boundary conditions on a complex geometry can significantly complicate any attempt to tackle the problem via analytical techniques, which involves some simplification assumptions in order to arrive at a solution. These assumptions will be related to the concept of three-dimensional thin wing issues in this chapter.
Chapter Preview
Top

2 Lift And Drag Estimation In A Finite Wing

We know an aeroplane is in the air because of the lift created by its wings as a result of higher pressure on the lower (bottom) surface and lower pressure on the suction (top) surface. The lift is produced by the pressure differential between the lower and higher surfaces. It also causes the flow to curve around at the wingtips as it is driven from the pressure surface to the suction surface. As a result, there will be a spanwise component of flow from the wingtip to the wing root, causing the streamlines on the upper surface to bend toward the wing root, as seen in Figure 1. Similarly, the spanwise component of flow on the bottom surface will be in the direction of the wing root to the wingtip. As a result, it is clear that the flow across the wings is three-dimensional, and their aerodynamic characteristics differ significantly from those of their airfoil sections (Figure 2).

Figure 1.

Front and top views of a three-dimensional wing's flow pattern

978-1-6684-4230-2.ch005.f01

The curling of the flow at the wing tips has additional effect on the wing's aerodynamic properties. This “flow slip” creates a circulatory motion that trails downstream of the wing, resulting in a trailing vortex at each wing tip, shedding downstream of the wing. These trailing vortices, which are emitted at the wing tip, cause a minor downward component of air velocity (opposite to the direction of lift) in the region of the wing. This downward component of air velocity is known as downwash, and it is generally represented by the symbol ‘w’. The downwash may alternatively be interpreted as the effect of the lifting wing “pressing down” on the air, causing the air to have more downward motion in the vicinity of the wing. As seen in Figure 3, downwash mixes with freestream velocity (Uf) to generate a local relative wind that is canted downward in the area of each airfoil segment.

Figure 2.

Diagram showing the shedding of wingtip vortices and the downwash

978-1-6684-4230-2.ch005.f02
Figure 3.

a) Two-dimensional airfoil section; b) three-dimensional wing are shown in a schematic diagram.

978-1-6684-4230-2.ch005.f03

The geometric angle of attack (𝛼) is defined as the angle formed by the chord line and the freestream direction. However, as seen in Figure 3, the local wind speed is inclined below the freestream velocity (Uf) by the angle (𝛼i) which is referred to as the induced angle of attack. When the induced downwash is wi and the freestream velocity is Uf, the induced angle of attack (𝛼i) is expressed as

978-1-6684-4230-2.ch005.m01
(1.1)

Complete Chapter List

Search this Book:
Reset