Knowledge Integration and Its Role in the Training of Health Professionals: The Cabo Verde Experience

Knowledge Integration and Its Role in the Training of Health Professionals: The Cabo Verde Experience

Isabel Ines Monteiro de Pina Araujo, António Leão Correia e Silva, Antonio Pedro da Costa Delgado, Deisa Semedo
DOI: 10.4018/978-1-7998-8011-0.ch015
OnDemand:
(Individual Chapters)
Available
$37.50
No Current Special Offers
TOTAL SAVINGS: $37.50

Abstract

Relevance is the basic value of any training project, in the cutting-cross of knowledge, attitudes, and competencies to be transmitted through the pedagogical process. Trends in science and the new directions of global health research requires personnel with vision, maturity, and skills for strategic planning. We are looking at a deepening gap between the professional status quo and the aspirations of society. This chapter aims to reflect on the role of the university focusing on the pillars that support it, in the context of training health professionals, and the central role of communication in the exercise of the profession and in health promotion. The approach is based on a theoretical review and the case study of Cabo Verde, as a SIDS. The role played by these professionals would have a direct impact on the definition of public health policies. These would be based on knowledge; the interface of innovation in health, management, and social organization; and on dialogue to improve systems from the perspectives of One Health and Global Health.
Chapter Preview
Top

In recent times, the gap between the professional status quo and society's aspirations has deepened. And it is through this gap that the traditional concept of health began to be called into question. This has occurred at least since the famous definition of the World Health Organization (WHO) inserted in its Constitution of 1946, which tells us that health is a state of complete physical, mental and social well-being, and not just the simple absence of illnesses. The positive or salutogenesis concept proposed by Aaron Antonovsky (Antonovsky, 1996) was then enshrined. This concept had the advantage of being more comprehensive, as it included in its focus social and personal resources, as well as physical capabilities (Becker CM, 2010). The trigger for this change was and has been the growing need to go beyond the limits of a health approach centered on combating disease and on clinical and hospital medicine with a focus on the individual. Since then, the objective has become that of overcoming a type of health action resulting from the mere application of the concept of pathogenesis, based on the study and fight against the development of the disease. A vision now seen as restrictive, minimalist, and reactive. This way of thinking and acting started to be affronted and contested, in the name of a new approach, characterized by comprehensiveness. We would say that the traditional concept is today impelled and challenged to include new topics, such as the interdependence between human, animal and environmental health, as well as the imperative of “health for all”, seen not only as a demand for political and ethical forum, but equally as the only way to ensure effectiveness and sustainability of health policies.

Complete Chapter List

Search this Book:
Reset