Mi Familia: Authentic Parent-Child Writing During Literacy Night

Mi Familia: Authentic Parent-Child Writing During Literacy Night

Howard L. Smith (The University of Texas at San Antonio, USA) and Kalpana Mukunda Iyengar (The University of Texas at San Antonio, USA)
DOI: 10.4018/978-1-5225-3955-1.ch009
OnDemand PDF Download:
List Price: $37.50


This chapter discusses the results of a writing activity during Family Literacy Night at a predominantly Hispanic, Title I school in the Southwest. This study, based on Socio-Cultural Theory (Moll, 2013), demonstrates the efficacy of asset-based approaches for instruction and assessment versus more traditional deficit models of minority education. As an analytic, the researchers applied the six Capitals from the Community Cultural Wealth (CCW) model (Yosso, 2005) to the children's writing samples. This framework revealed a variety of strengths common to Latino and bilingual households including the metalinguistic skill of translanguaging. Data was processed through Holistic Content Analysis (Lieblich, 2005) followed by thematic analysis (Falk & Blumenreich, 2005) supported by CCW. Results underscore the importance of out-of-school literacies and their affective impact on children from underserved communities. Moreover, results argue for more home- and community-based writing assignments to reveal student values, desires, and emotions, which encourage the joy of writing.
Chapter Preview


Educators are challenged to find practices and activities that foster literacy development in students at all levels. This is especially so in schools with large numbers of English language learners from marginalized communities.  Their rich cultural wealth (e.g.  music or dance [Iyengar  & Smith, 2016]) or linguistic practices and skills (e.g.,  translanguaging [Garcia, 2009]) are often ignored or disparaged within the school curriculum.  Though most schools have some parental involvement activities, even these tend to be prescriptive and vapid (Greenfeld, Epstein, & Hutchins, 2013).  While they may connect with the home or community in some cursory way, ultimately what drives the literacy experience is the prefabricated curriculum.  Just as problematic, schools too often ignore the countless culturally contextualized ways and spaces in which children may acquire literacy.

At their places of worship, young devotees may engage in literacy practices around a variety of texts including: the Bible, Torah, or Vedas (liturgy). Recitation of the Quran or the chanting of slokas (hymns) also contributes to literacy development. Cultures with performing arts (e.g., folk songs, corridos, hip-hop, Bharatanatyam) utilize alternative forms of literacy to communicate feelings and ideas.

In the same way, students interact with labels and signs in their community and learn popular songs that permeate their home and neighborhood. Even newspapers or advertisements that are perused and recycled make a contribution to the learner’s understanding of literacies and their possible uses. When shopping—at a mall, a “superstore” or the neighborhood grocer—individuals must contend with stickers, brand names, measurements and prices. Restaurants with menus or signs promoting “La especial del día” (special of the day), like hotel direction signs (e.g., Lobby, Front Desk, Pool) or bus schedules, all create an awareness of and help to refine the students’ literacy abilities. We argue that such culturally framed spaces present a wealth of information and should be incorporated into school literacy practices for joyful, meaningful engagement with the linguistic modalities of listening, speaking, reading and writing.

The authors propose that literacy instruction in schools would become more productive and more enjoyable if it were re-cast. This presupposes a fundamental need to expand choices of modalities of expression, modify purposes for assignments, alter the modes of evaluation and legitimize the content of the texts to reflect the community cultural wealth. In lieu of a constraining focus on formulaic structures, pre-determined vocabularies, artificial audiences (e.g., Class, write a letter to King Lear… or Use the adjectives from this to make sentences to describe Princess Padmini), and monolingual, English-only compositions, lessons should be designed to leverage all of the students’ lived experiences and perspectives during literacy instruction.

Bronfenbrenner's ecological systems theory clearly establishes the interstitial nature of a child's multiple worlds and their effect on learning (Jeronimus, Riese, Sanderman, & Ormel, 2014) and presumably, their literacy development. The scholarship on early literacy reveals that young children before formal schooling are able to create and engage around text in meaningful ways  (e.g. Atwell, 1987; Clay, 2005; Goodman, 1984).   In the same way, countless studies document the contributions to literacy development that lie outside the formal writing curriculum (Iyengar  & Smith, 2016; Flores & Riojas-Cortez, 2009). 

Key Terms in this Chapter

Socio-Cultural Theory (SCT): An epistemological complex that privileges human interaction in the process of acquiring new knowledge. Proposed by the late Russian scholar Lev Vygotsky, SCLT accounts for the influence of social conditions on teaching and learning.

Capitals: Human resources, skills, and abilities that can be leveraged to circumvent social, economic, and or institutional barriers to education achievement. These resources are inherited through cultural affiliations and preserved through social interactions.

Community Cultural Wealth (CCW): An asset-based model of human and cultural resources which contests a pathological view of poor and other marginalized communities. A tool for social justice and educational equity, Yosso proffers the framework to teachers to disrupt practices that oppress, silence, and marginalize minority learners. Parsed into six strands or capitals, the CCW Model includes: (a) Linguistic (b) Familial (c) Aspirational (d) Navigational (e) Resistance (f) Social.

Identity Construction (IC): A psychological process through which the individual amalgamates the characteristics (e.g., ethnicity, language, gender orientation) into a unified “public persona.” The process is both dynamic, depending on context, and fluid, depending upon immediate proxemics. IC is not only determined by the individual, but also constrained by social norms and conventions (e.g., marriage, religion, area).

Latinos: A demographic label referring to community groups descending from the Spanish-speaking diaspora in the Western Hemisphere.

Funds of Knowledge: Refers to the historically and culturally accumulated understandings that are acquired through social interaction with a More Knowledgeable Other.

Translanguaging: Refers to a socio-linguistic process which comprises morphology (i.e. word choice), syntax (i.e., grammatical structures), phonology (i.e., pronunciation), register (i.e., formal vs. informal), and idiolect (i.e., stylistics). While encompassing the idea of “code-switching,” translanguaging is a fluid process that responds to the social and cultural constraints placed upon language choice.

Family Literacy: Refers to activities from the linguistic modalities of listening, speaking, reading, and writing that children with other family members intentionally engage. Not constrained by a formal setting or space or prescribed curriculum, these naturalistic literacy experiences epitomize the socio-cultural context of literacy.

Complete Chapter List

Search this Book: