Abstract
This study has the aim to analyze the different perspectives on socio-ecological innovation management models. The analysis departs if socio-ecological innovation initiatives connect to resources and capabilities, culture, creativity, tacit, and formal knowledge between nurtured entrepreneurship and different domains of innovation management models that become supply factors to determine the production potential and based on this assumption to analyze the ability to economic growth. The method used is the meta-analytic reflection based on theoretical and empirical literature review. It is concluded that the socio-ecological thinking and collaborative knowledge production takes the natural environmental resources for socio-ecological management innovation relevant for the transition towards the analytical framework for innovation management models This is a crucial factor that contributes to economic development of the internal and external environments full of a range of threats and opportunities because the interactions of biological diversity.
TopMain Focus Of The Chapter
The increased complexity of production interconnected information, requires learning about the internal cognitive. Also, needs socio-ecological resources with external resources and, network linkages. Resources, units, users, and governance systems interact in complex socio-ecological systems to produce outcomes despite of being separated (Ostrom, 2009).
The distinction between the capacious and the conventional innovation models is the different policy implications. In this way a modeling calibration may reveal the differences in development patterns. A spatial socio-ecological innovation model can implement innovative policy methodologies and instruments. Those implementations aimed to address the growth of land use related to emission. Meaning that controlling the growth zone will mitigate emissions.
Key Terms in this Chapter
Public innovation policies: a form of state intervention in the local economy of the environment. They are applied to promotion context of the local innovation systems based on the university. And they have substantial public resources and capacities in research infrastructure and training.
Sustainable Development: Which is conceptualized as the development of industrial enterprises related to the components with the environment, the economic, social, and ecological.
Socio-ecological transition: The results from long-term dynamic spatial and functional energy metabolism in connections and disconnections of changes in energy metabolism (natural resources, land uses, local governance, etc.) affecting local social-ecological regimes. Secondly, as a process of spatial, temporal, and functional-dysfunctional connection and disconnection of industrial complexes to combine or decouple urban metabolism from local natural resources.