Promoting L2 Learner Engagement in Online English Language Classes: A Model of Authentic Activities for Online Learning

Promoting L2 Learner Engagement in Online English Language Classes: A Model of Authentic Activities for Online Learning

Merve Ay Yilmaz, Derin Atay
DOI: 10.4018/978-1-7998-8981-6.ch008
OnDemand:
(Individual Chapters)
Available
$37.50
No Current Special Offers
TOTAL SAVINGS: $37.50

Abstract

This study aims to investigate whether and to what extent students experience (dis)engagement in online language learning. In order to utilize the malleable feature of student engagement, the present study explores the facilitative impacts of a collaborative authentic task on promoting student engagement in online language learning. Participants included 88 high school students. The data was gathered over a four-week period through an engagement questionnaire and focus group interviews. The results suggest that a collaborative real-world relevant task that involves learners' views and opinions and produces output that is useful in real-life is likely to boost learners' online class engagement cognitively, agentically, behaviorally, and emotionally. Moreover, as the flow of instruction involves less structure but more dialogue and self-directedness, the implementation of a collaborative task authentic task notably decreases transactional distance.
Chapter Preview
Top

Literature Review

The Construct of Engagement

While a vast majority of published report have revealed that implicit learning constitutes a major part of language acquisition, learners’ conscious mental involvement has also been recognized as a crucial element for efficient L2 acquisition (Ellis, 2015). According to Pace (1998), engagement refers to learners’ specific behaviors within a learning environment that demonstrate the quality of their participation or investment in the learning process. In a similar vein, Duchesne and Philip (2016) construed the term engagement as learners’ interest and involvement in an activity. Research on engagement to date has been largely concerned with predicting learner engagement (Reschly & Christensen, 2012). Previous studies have defined and conceptualized learner engagement differently such as the amount of language production (Dörnyei & Kormos, 2000), the level of attention paid to the language features (Storch, 2008), the effort to work collaboratively with peers and complete task goals (Bygate & Samuda 2009), the planning, persistence and time-management in fulfilling a task (Martin, 2010). Skinner and Pitzer (2012) defined engagement as “constructive, enthusiastic, willing, emotionally positive and cognitively focused participation with learning activities in school” (p. 22).

Complete Chapter List

Search this Book:
Reset