Research-Based Strategies in an Electric Circuits Lab: Tutorials and RealTime Physics Approaches

Research-Based Strategies in an Electric Circuits Lab: Tutorials and RealTime Physics Approaches

Monica Quezada-Espinoza (Tecnologico de Monterrey, Mexico) and Genaro Zavala (Tecnologico de Monterrey, Mexico & Universidad Andres Bello, Chile)
DOI: 10.4018/978-1-5225-2026-9.ch018
OnDemand PDF Download:


This study reports the outcomes of comparing three methods to carry out a physics laboratory with active learning strategies: Tutorials in Introductory Physics (Tutorials) and RealTime Physics (RTP). A sample of 476 students was divided into three groups, about one third of the students used Tutorials, another third used RTP, and the last third used RTP with graphing calculators and probes. A multiple choice test was used to find that the three groups had statistically-significant differences on conceptual understanding of current concepts. Additionally, it was found differences in gains among the three groups using a multiple-choice pretest and posttest. With an analysis of misconceptions it was found that an important portion of students still holding misconceptions. The change of instruction seems to affect conceptual understanding when students have to analyze difficult circuits. Besides, it was found that students still holding misconceptions, they continue using terms like current and voltage interchangeably.
Chapter Preview


The use of educational technologies in university physics has increased dramatically in the last few years. Over the past few decades, mostly in the United States, Physics Education Research (PER) has provided deep insight into how students learn physics at all educational levels (Fraser, Timan, Miller, Dowd, Tucker & Mazur, 2014). A subject of interest in PER is electricity and magnetism. Electricity is a scientific and basic topic with relevance to everyday life (Bilal & Erol, 2009). Research on students’ understanding of electric circuit concepts (Cohen, Eylon & Ganiel, 1983; Engelhardt & Beichner, 2004; Hewitt, 2007; Shipstone, 1988; Zavala & Velarde, 2009) has shown that students still have basic misconceptions regarding current and voltage concepts. The related literature has proved that, with circuits in series and parallel, the current and voltage behavior are difficult concepts for students (McDermott, 1992; Peşman & Eryılmaz, 2010; Engelhardt & Beichner, 2004).

In the last two decades, different research-based instructional strategies have been designed encouraging interactive engagement among students and to improve student’s conceptual learning (Hake, 1998; Fraser et al., 2014), such as Tutorials in Introductory Physics (McDermott, Shaffer & PERG-WU, 2001) and RealTime Physics worksheets (Sokoloff, Thornton, & Laws, 2004). Furthermore, use of technology is reported in literature as a successful tool that contributes to interaction, discussion and involvement from students, mainly talking about computers (Beichner & Abbott, 1999; Dancy & Beichner, 2006; Tarekegn, 2009; Zavala & Velarde, 2009). In the same way, the use of graphing calculator has taken relevance as an educational tool (Bos, 2007; Cavanagh, 2003; Doerr & Zangor, 2000; Jones, 2005; Robutti, 2009), since the evolution of technology allows graphing calculator to be used as a computer. The advantages of using a calculator are that it is less expensive and portable compared to computers.

This research proposes to compare two active learning strategies, Tutorials in Introductory Physics and RealTime Physics, through a conceptual learning analysis (Hake, 1998), that allows us to see the outlook of pros and cons of changing the instruction, such as the use of calculators instead of the use of computer in a research-based strategy.

The main goal is to compare the students’ conceptual learning when they perform the laboratory session in three different manners:

  • 1.

    Using RealTime Physics with a graphing calculator and probes

  • 2.

    Using RealTime Physics with a computer and probes

  • 3.

    Using Tutorials in Introductory Physics

The active learning approach helps student’s conceptual understanding and promote long-term retention of knowledge (Wattanakasiwich, Khamcharean, Taleab, & Sharma, 2012). The use of electronic devices (or lack thereof) gave rise to conduct this research. It is our interest to evaluate the efficacy of the use of a calculator as a substitute for a computer. These two options were also compared (RTP plus computer and RTP plus calculator) to Tutorials in Introductory Physics, a very useful strategy reported in the literature.

Key Terms in this Chapter

Research-Based Strategy: Methodology to conduct a lecture, lab session, or homework, concerned about students’ engagement and understanding. Promotes involvement with the activities, deep thinking, discussion, observation, participation, motivation, and so on, to improve students’ conceptual learning.

Microcomputer-Based Laboratory: Laboratory session supported by a computer, an interface and probes to collect data in real time. Students are able to experiment real physical phenomena, manipulate data and observe directly the nature´s behavior. At the present, electronic devices are more sophisticated and easy to handle, this allow to substitute a desktop computer with smaller devices.

Voltage: Or electric potential difference, is the electric potential energy per unit charge, measured in volts.

Electric Current: In electric circuits the electric current is a flow of charge in a wire, it is measured in Amperes.

Conceptual Learning: When students overcome misconceptions and adopt the scientific-accepted conception of a science phenomenon.

Misconception: Students have conceptions that explain some physical phenomena, but these notions are different from the accepted conceptions of the experts.

Gain: It is a ratio of what students learned to what students could have learned. The gain reflects variation in the effectiveness of the pedagogy and/or implementation.

Complete Chapter List

Search this Book: