Researcher Positionality in the Dissertation in Practice

Researcher Positionality in the Dissertation in Practice

Jess Smith, Brooke Blevins, Nicholas R. Werse, Sandra Talbert
Copyright: © 2022 |Pages: 17
DOI: 10.4018/978-1-6684-5602-6.ch025
OnDemand:
(Individual Chapters)
Available
$37.50
No Current Special Offers
TOTAL SAVINGS: $37.50

Abstract

This chapter explores first the role of researcher perspective in the research process, then the unique nuances of the researcher positionality in dissertations in practice, followed by a discussion of the advantages and limitations of the unique positionality assumed by dissertations in practice. This chapter concludes by noting the importance of constructing conceptual coherence between the implications of the scholarly-practitioner's positionality statement and the discussion of the dissertation's ethical considerations and limitations. The dissertation in practice, more so than with traditional Ph.D. dissertations, assumes that the researcher holds close personal connections to the research site, participants, and contexts. Far from envisioning the researcher as an objective outside observer, the dissertation in practice assumes that the researcher has a vested interest in solving the professional problem of practice within their place of employment in the presence of colleagues. For this reason, the full disclosure of the researcher's positionality becomes all the more important.
Chapter Preview
Top

Background: Understanding Researcher Positionality

Researcher positionality statements are most often found in qualitative research or research rooted in an interpretivist worldview, wherein the researcher seeks the understandings and interpretations of their participants rather than attempting to ascertain one singular, measurable truth. Positionality generally refers to what researchers know and believe about the world around them and is shaped by their experiences in social and political contexts. A researcher’s positionality shapes their interpretations, understandings, and beliefs about their research as well as other’s research. Holmes (2014) argues,

Open and honest disclosure and exposition of positionality should show where and how the researcher believes that they have influenced their research; the reader should then be able to make an informed judgment as to the researcher’s influence on the research process and how ‘truthful’ they feel the research is. (p. 6)

Complete Chapter List

Search this Book:
Reset