Scientometric Indicators: Features and Categorization

Scientometric Indicators: Features and Categorization

DOI: 10.4018/978-1-5225-5945-0.ch004
OnDemand:
(Individual Chapters)
Available
$37.50
No Current Special Offers
TOTAL SAVINGS: $37.50

Abstract

In research, indicators are partial since each indicator is susceptible to methodological and technical problems that require both decisions by the indicator developer as well as corrections and modifications at researcher's level. Considering the different limitations, the question arises whether one can use research indicators in an efficient way forever. Given the fact that we now know quite a lot about the strengths and weaknesses of such indicators, it does not contradict their use, but an inexperienced handling of such indicators should be avoided.
Chapter Preview
Top

Categorization Of Indicators

Scientometric indicators have been classified by various researchers into different categories. These categories are based on a defined set of the characteristics of indicators. Though the foundation of scientometric indicators have a history dating back to the advent of Science Citation Index (SCI) database by Eugene Garfield in Philadelphia in 1963. Researchers from different fields have described how these indicators can be categorized depending upon the facets of their use, application, subject area etc. Various studies regarding the classification and categorization of scientometric indicators have been put forth at various levels. The most prominent amongst them are discussed in this chapter.

Okubo (1997) categorized Scientometric indicators in two classes.

  • The first class is dedicated to the quantitative indicators, which reflect the quantitative aspect of science and technology activities. Quantitative indicators of Science and Technology comprises of the number of papers, the number of co-signers, the number of citations, the number of patents and the number of patent signer citations.

  • The second deals with relational indicators, i.e. indicators that quantify relations and collaborations among the various performers in S&T systems, particularly in the international perspective. Relational indicators include Co-citations, Co-publications, the affinity index, Correlations between scientific papers and patents, scientific links measured by citations, and the “co-occurrence” of words.

Likewise Gauthier (1998) classified scientometric indicators into following two major categories:

Complete Chapter List

Search this Book:
Reset