Towards Blending Potentialities within a Learning Management System: Definitions, Issues, and Trends

Towards Blending Potentialities within a Learning Management System: Definitions, Issues, and Trends

Copyright: © 2015 |Pages: 30
DOI: 10.4018/978-1-4666-8705-9.ch004
OnDemand PDF Download:
No Current Special Offers


The emergence of blended (b-)learning approaches clearly highlights a pressing need for higher education institutions to embrace innovation and change. However, the process of (sociocultural) innovation should be driven by people and pedagogical concepts that are related with new technological developments in a meaningful way for the purpose of adding value to teaching and learning. From this holistic perspective, definitions and issues directly related with b-learning, Information and Communication Technology (ICT) use, pedagogical planning, course management system, Learning Management Systems (LMS) (such as Moodle), usability, accessibility, inclusivity and adaptability are critically discussed in this chapter. In addition, some LMS trends that refer to personalized-, mobile-, systemic-learning conclude the chapter.
Chapter Preview


The “knowledge society” can be seen as a collectivity of multiple learning opportunities.

Contemporary educational environments require renewed attitudes and competences from teachers and learners in order to avoid the traditional approach where the teacher is seen as the unique source of information/knowledge and learners are seen as passive receivers. The effectiveness of education systems and online learning is based on the ability to adapt the system to the different teaching-learning scenarios. At the same time, online communities across a variety of platforms are considered privileged places of learning, which, due to their interactive/collaborative nature, enable information share among several users, and motivate new people to use Information and Communication Technology (ICT) (Ala-Mutka et al., 2008).

Learning Management Systems (LMSs), as well as pedagogical models, should try to fit to the learner’s differences. According to Visser (2005), for Higher Education Institutions (HEIs) in transition to the Web (1.0/2.0/3.0), there are opportunities and responsibilities to redefine/readjust the role of the teacher and the student (Visser, 2005). The teaching-learning process has adopted novel working styles, promoting co-production of knowledge and emphasizing specific learning skills, such as creativity, collaboration, critical capacity, and communication (Bruns & Humpherys, 2007). In this line, Berge (1995) identified four key-areas of intervention, concerning the general role of the online teacher; in particular, he refers to:

  • Pedagogical area, i.e., the online teacher is seen as a facilitator of the teaching-learning process, stimulating group work, discussions and questioning,

  • Social area, i.e., the online tutor promotes relations between all stakeholders of the group, establishing, a posteriori, a harmonious learning community, constituting a group identity in sharing information,

  • Management area, i.e., the online teacher needs to concern with issues related to the organization, planning and management of the course, establishing rules and objectives, and

  • Technical area, i.e., the online teacher implements efficient technologies, focusing the attention of the student to the contents (online activities), rather than to the actual ICT that is used.

Overall, the spectrum of different types of online learning can be seen as a continuum from Face-to-Face (F2F) to fully online learning. In particular, blended (b-)learning typically involves combining aspects of traditional F2F activity with computer-mediated support. In general, blended approaches attempt to thoughtfully “blend” time-constrained and place-dependent, synchronous activities, with time-independent/flexible and asynchronous activities. Through a blended methodology, teachers and learners are encouraged to work together to improve the quality of teaching and learning.

Online learning platforms, also known as Course Management Systems (CMSs), are being widely used for educational delivery, in various ways, such as online testing, course discussion, assignment submission and grading, varying in functionality, ease of use and cost. A few, such as LMS Moodle, are open source, but others, such as LMS Blackboard, are proprietary.

According to Katz (2003), CMSs are among the most significant technologies that have been introduced in the delivery of education. Simultaneously, investment in CMS has increased abruptly (Williams & Williams, 2010); however, research into its effectiveness is in a premature stage. Unlike single user systems (e.g., word processors, spreadsheets), CMSs have the ability to connect multiple users together. In this way, they not only handle with individual communications/interactions, but also support collaboration through sharing of information, managing group information, and asynchronous/synchronous discussions. In fact, research on CMS adoption, implementation, use, impact and benefits are truly necessary in order to develop recommendations for stakeholders. These issues are explored in details in the succeeding sections.

Complete Chapter List

Search this Book: