University Task Force Deepens Academic Involvement in ERP System

University Task Force Deepens Academic Involvement in ERP System

Michael Crow (Kansas State University, USA)
DOI: 10.4018/978-1-60566-400-2.ch025
OnDemand PDF Download:
No Current Special Offers


Kansas State University has ensured greatly increased academic involvement in the implementation of its new student information system through the use of an Academic Task Force. Consisting of Associate and Assistant Deans, each college of the university is represented on the task force to work directly with project management to review and revise university procedures as well as suggest system enhancements with the goal of melding the new system into the long term objectives of the university. This case study explores the evolution of the task force from its beginnings, springing out of an update session with an academic policy and procedure committee to the point that the task force eventually supplanted the Project Steering Committee as the primary conduit of information exchange between the project team and the academic community.
Chapter Preview


The LASER (Legacy Applications System Replacement) project was born out of an overarching vision of data sharing to replace the traditional silo effect of legacy systems (Fitzgerald, Rivenbark & Schelin, 2003). This vision was formalized into the Integrated Information Initiative, a ten-year plan to distribute information more widely among users with the appropriate “educational need to know”. By breaking down silos of information and transforming the culture from one of data ownership to one of data stewardship, information could be more readily accessed by decision makers to better forecast and plan for future trends. The centerpiece of this initiative was the LASER project, an effort to replace the aging, mainframe-based conglomeration of disparate pieces including a student information system, a billing and receivables system and a financial aid management system among others.

Like most of its peer universities, K-State had maintained and modified these robust but functionally constrained systems for a quarter century or more and the core operating system had long since exceeded its useful life. Only by constant innovation and customization had the institution been able to maintain its cutting edge delivery of services to students and faculty. However, with the natural limitations of the application, combined with an ever-shrinking pool of labor with the necessary skill-set to maintain and push the boundary of the system’s ability to deliver new functionality, it became clear that a replacement system would be necessary and a fully integrated ERP would be the system of choice. This choice would fulfill the desires of the administration for a comprehensive approach to data administration that would allow the university to break out of the silo mentality and make data available to far more users more effectively and efficiently.

The original system of choice was the Oracle Student System (OSS), which held the promise for adaptability in line with the vision of the Integrated Information Initiative. Although the OSS application held high Gartner scores for innovation, it was not sufficiently developed at the time to meet all of the needs of a “Top 25 Connected” university with an aggressive implementation timeline (Harris, & Zastrocky, 2005, K-State Media Relations, 2004).

Key Terms in this Chapter

Shared Governance: Higher education concept of university management as a bilateral responsibility of both the central administration and the faculty.

Matriculation: A specific process in the PeopleSoft application that allows the student record to move from under the aegis of the Admissions process to the Records process, thus enabling term activation and enrollment.

Educational ‘Need to Know’: Concept for determining who should have access to a student’s educational records as regulated by the Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act of 1974, known as FERPA.

Silo Effect: Lack of information exchange between data base systems within an entity or with outside entities. The silo may be limited to the technical deficiencies of the system, but the effect encompasses the larger human problem of the silo mentality, which includes a predisposition away from sharing such information.

Complete Chapter List

Search this Book: