Using Primary Research Literature to Teach Critical Thinking in Pre-Service Teacher Education

Using Primary Research Literature to Teach Critical Thinking in Pre-Service Teacher Education

Wei Wei, Michelle A. Hudson, Anne E. Cook
DOI: 10.4018/978-1-5225-7823-9.ch022
OnDemand:
(Individual Chapters)
Available
$37.50
No Current Special Offers
TOTAL SAVINGS: $37.50

Abstract

Much of the coursework in pre-service teacher education programs focuses on “best practices” in classroom teaching that span from general pedagogical knowledge and pedagogical content knowledge (e.g., methods, management, assessment, etc.), in addition to supervised practica and student teaching experiences. Given that pre-service (and in-service) education students are being prepared for a career in teaching, coursework should also prepare them to understand, critique, and adapt to changes in best practices that occur over the course of their careers. The authors argue that one of the best ways to prepare students for changes in educational practices is to help them understand where best practices come from in the first place—primary research in education. Reading, thinking critically about, and applying the findings from primary research articles can improve the professional development of pre-service teachers. The goals of this chapter are to 1) provide a review of the benefits of requiring primary research articles as required readings in undergraduate curriculum, 2) underscore the argument for why primary research should be included in pre-service teacher education curriculum, and 3) offer a model for how this could be implemented in a pre-service teacher education curriculum.
Chapter Preview
Top

Benefits Of Reading Primary Research Literature

Textbooks play a critical role in education, as they provide students with condensed knowledge in a particular content area (Wiegant, Scager, & Boonstra, 2011). However, textbooks are considered secondary sources of scientific knowledge that are used to discuss, comment on, and/or criticize primary sources such as peer-reviewed journal articles, conference papers, and theses/dissertations, instead of providing the original details of a particular study (Duncan, Lubman, & Hoskins, 2011). Furthermore, many textbooks span such a broad array of topics in a domain that they are unable to cover in-depth discussion of specific issues in the field (Harrington et al., 2015). In a worst-case scenario, textbook authors may convey the relationship between research hypotheses incorrectly, due largely to a lack of understanding of issues within a particular subarea of a scientific field (Gibbs & Lawson, 1992).

Complete Chapter List

Search this Book:
Reset