Acceptance and Effectiveness of Rain Classroom in Linguistics Classes

Acceptance and Effectiveness of Rain Classroom in Linguistics Classes

Zhonggen Yu, Han Yi
Copyright: © 2020 |Pages: 14
DOI: 10.4018/IJMBL.2020040105
OnDemand:
(Individual Articles)
Available
$37.50
No Current Special Offers
TOTAL SAVINGS: $37.50

Abstract

Rain Classroom, a mobile learning technology developed in China, has received great popularity. Research into its acceptance and effectiveness, however, remains sparse. Through research instruments, i.e. a questionnaire adapted from the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM), a semi-structured interview and linguistics knowledge tests, both quantitative and qualitative data were obtained to test research hypotheses. It was concluded that (1) Rain Classroom possesses significantly higher acceptance than traditional multimedia projecting systems in terms of performance expectancy, effort expectancy, social influence, facilitating conditions, and attitude at the significance level .05; and (2) Rain Classroom contributes to significantly higher linguistics knowledge gain than traditional multimedia projecting systems at the significance level .05. Future research could aim to improve and enhance the functions of Rain Classroom in order to pursue higher acceptance and effectiveness. Cross-disciplinary research could also be conducted to test its acceptance and effectiveness.
Article Preview
Top

Literature Review

Rain Classroom has been evidenced as effective in learning by many studies. Learners positively evaluated that Rain Classroom assisted learning, in which they showed their willingness to participate. Assisted with Rain Classroom, teachers also achieved success in curriculum design, organization of learning activities and implementation of teaching strategies (Li & Song, 2017). Aided with Rain Classroom, Yu (2018) designed a five-step teaching method, which could activate students’ participation, enhance their self-discipline, and promote their learning effect.

Coupled with quantitative evaluation and diverse pedagogical approaches, Rain Classroom could effectively be used in teaching and learning (Liao & Ding, 2018). Rain Classroom could help teachers design appropriate teaching styles and improve College English teaching and learning effect (Lou et al., 2018). Integrating Rain Classroom into pedagogy could also improve effectiveness in the instruction of English for postgraduates (Yuan et al., 2018), ideological and political courses for tertiary students (Han, 2018), English communicative courses (Yang, 2017), translation and interpretation of business English (Zhu, 2016), biological courses for graduates (Yang & Yuan, 2016), and Blended Methods (Yao, 2017). The Rain Classroom integrated platform could also effectively promote learners’ information technology literacy, as well as mastery of learning theories (Li et al., 2017). This study aims to confirm the effectiveness and acceptance of Rain Classroom among English language learners.

Interaction is an unavoidable element to be included when discussing the effect of educational technologies on learning. Mainly three types of interactions are studied, i.e. learner-learner interaction, learner-teacher interaction and learner-content interaction. Close attention should be paid to these three interactions (Parsazadeh et al., 2018). By linking teachers, students and learning contents, Rain Classroom has taken these three interactions into account, which it lays a solid ground for its effect on learning and teaching.

Usability is another important element to determine the effectiveness of educational technologies, such as Rain Classroom, and other various kinds of mobile applications. The degree of usability of educational technology greatly influences the acceptance and satisfaction of users, which exerts a great impact on technology assisted learning outcomes and academic achievements (Shitkova, Holler, Heide, Clever, & Becker, 2015). When designing and using educational technologies, numerous factors such as convenience, ease of use, data input, Internet connection, and computer processing speed, should be taken into account (Nielsen & Budiu, 2013).

Complete Article List

Search this Journal:
Reset
Volume 16: 1 Issue (2024)
Volume 15: 2 Issues (2023): 1 Released, 1 Forthcoming
Volume 14: 4 Issues (2022)
Volume 13: 4 Issues (2021)
Volume 12: 4 Issues (2020)
Volume 11: 4 Issues (2019)
Volume 10: 4 Issues (2018)
Volume 9: 4 Issues (2017)
Volume 8: 4 Issues (2016)
Volume 7: 4 Issues (2015)
Volume 6: 4 Issues (2014)
Volume 5: 4 Issues (2013)
Volume 4: 4 Issues (2012)
Volume 3: 4 Issues (2011)
Volume 2: 4 Issues (2010)
Volume 1: 4 Issues (2009)
View Complete Journal Contents Listing