Game the Oretic Approach for Cloud Service Negotiation

Game the Oretic Approach for Cloud Service Negotiation

Ramesh C., Santhiya K., Rakesh Kumar S., Rizwan Patan
Copyright: © 2021 |Pages: 10
DOI: 10.4018/IJGHPC.2021100104
OnDemand:
(Individual Articles)
Available
$37.50
No Current Special Offers
TOTAL SAVINGS: $37.50

Abstract

Cloud computing is a booming technology in the area of digital markets. Tackling the nonfunctional characteristics is a big challenge between service consumers (SC) and service providers (SP). Without proper negotiation between the participants specifying their quality of service (QoS) requirements, service level agreement (SLA) cannot be achieved. Two strategies that are commonly prevalent in the negotiation process are concession model and trade off model. The concession model assures the service consumer (SC) receiving the services on time without any deferment. But service consumer has only limited utility. To balance the utility and achievement rates, the authors propose a mixed negotiation approach for cloud service negotiation, which is based on “Game of Chicken.” Extensive results show that a mixed negotiation approach brings equal amount of satisfaction to both service consumer and service provider in terms of achieving higher utility and outperforms the concession approach, while taking fewer time delays than that of a tradeoff approach.
Article Preview
Top

This section describes about mechanisms that are used previously. Before sometime, customers unaware of the information about different providers and the trend, so they prefer brokers, who give quick financial arrangements. Thus, in the cloud, clients face a similar issue of recognizing the best supplier in the profoundly expanded wide market. The procedure of arrangement which practically varies alongside the time. The agent may not totally uncover or portray their very own inclination before an important agreement.

The inclination elicitation subsystem is a notable troublesome and time taking procedure, especially when an agent is with complex inclinations. So the consumption of time will be more. A multi-attribute negotiation system is much necessary at this point to assist the agents in negotiating their issues strong and sturdy, in the domain where the agents are unaware of their opponents’ preference or completely illustrative of their own preference. X. Zheng et al. (2012) apply tradeoff approaches for cloud administration arrangement, and contrast them with the concession based ones. Instead of concession based ones, tradeoff methodologies don't diminish one's utility, yet at the same time can make a proposition alluring to its rival. X. Zheng et al. (2014), Clouds will be required to help enormous quantities of cooperation’s with differing quality prerequisites. A quality model for cloud services, called CLOUDQUAL.

Complete Article List

Search this Journal:
Reset
Volume 16: 1 Issue (2024)
Volume 15: 2 Issues (2023)
Volume 14: 6 Issues (2022): 1 Released, 5 Forthcoming
Volume 13: 4 Issues (2021)
Volume 12: 4 Issues (2020)
Volume 11: 4 Issues (2019)
Volume 10: 4 Issues (2018)
Volume 9: 4 Issues (2017)
Volume 8: 4 Issues (2016)
Volume 7: 4 Issues (2015)
Volume 6: 4 Issues (2014)
Volume 5: 4 Issues (2013)
Volume 4: 4 Issues (2012)
Volume 3: 4 Issues (2011)
Volume 2: 4 Issues (2010)
Volume 1: 4 Issues (2009)
View Complete Journal Contents Listing