Importance and Impact of Culture and People in Continuous Improvement

Importance and Impact of Culture and People in Continuous Improvement

Copyright: © 2018 |Pages: 32
DOI: 10.4018/IJSKD.2018100102
OnDemand:
(Individual Articles)
Available
$37.50
No Current Special Offers
TOTAL SAVINGS: $37.50

Abstract

The primary objective of this article is to establish the importance and impact of culture and people within organizations to developing continuous improvement. The research encompasses an empirical analysis and chronological literature review to establish viable interactions between people and culture. It will discuss the critical factors in organizational culture and their ramifications on continuous improvement and the somewhat symbiotic relationship between culture and continuous improvement. Moreover, the article will indicate the impact of these relationships on the overall success of the business. The study will then make recommendations on how best organizations can implement sustainable measures to ensure continuous improvement in a highly dynamic and competitive environment.
Article Preview
Top

Introduction

The sustainability of a business relies on its ability to thrive in its industry. The business environment is consistently changing due to advances in technology, behavioral change among employees, modifications in government policies, and even common variations. Businesses, therefore, should create practical strategies to ensure they remain afloat in their respective industries (Bhasin, 2013). One of the most common techniques companies use is continuous improvement. This model allows businesses to consistently assess their structures, models of operations and processes, outputs, and make adjustments that enhance efficiency and productivity. According to (Milner, 2016), continuous improvements (CI) enable companies to sustain incremental performance, improve customer satisfaction, and even improve product quality. Companies make small changes over time with the objective that the minor changes will add up to significant steps that establish growth and prosperity.

Many companies use variant strategies to achieve sustainable growth. These methods, which will be discussed in this study, are chosen upon the considerations of the organizations’ needs, wants, preferences, and resources. The choice of a CI strategy requires excellent decision-making and consultation between executives, managers, and employees to find the method of best fit. Even though the underlying function of CI (to make strategic improvements to gain a competitive advantage) is almost homogenous, processes cannot be applied in the same fashion (Arumugam, 2016). This inapplicability arises from the uniqueness of every business environment. While a model may work efficiently in the service industry, the same method may be detrimental to the manufacturing industry.

On the other hand, the culture and persons in the organizations play a critical role in determining the best approach (Dale, 2015). Each company has its corporate culture as a unique identifier against its competitors. While some companies have a customer-oriented culture, others are more profit driven. The variants in corporate culture affect how continuous improvement within the organization is established. Employees who embrace their corporate identity and perform not because they are paid to or have a moral obligation, but because they perceive the company as an extension of their selves, are more likely to engage in activities that foster continuous improvements as opposed to demotivated employees (Derrick-Mills, 2015). All managers need to collaborate actively and consistently with their employees to allow efficient implementation of CI approaches. The employees are the tools, and their input and goodwill are pivotal in establishing a culture of continuous improvement.

Research Gap

The current literature highlights the current gap in research. While there is a wealth of literature that shows the crucial role that culture plays in continuous improvement environments. However, there is an evident gap in knowledge regarding how culture enables the smooth progression of constant improvement environments. This research stems from the knowledge gaps that exist within the related literature on the sustainability of continuous improvement environments in different cultures. The focus of this study is to evaluate the elements and applications of the most culture in the area of continuous improvement environments. The study sought to examine the overlaps and disparities of culture in continuous improvement environments to understand the differences and similarities between them.

Complete Article List

Search this Journal:
Reset
Volume 16: 1 Issue (2024)
Volume 15: 1 Issue (2023)
Volume 14: 4 Issues (2022): 2 Released, 2 Forthcoming
Volume 13: 4 Issues (2021)
Volume 12: 4 Issues (2020)
Volume 11: 4 Issues (2019)
Volume 10: 4 Issues (2018)
Volume 9: 4 Issues (2017)
Volume 8: 4 Issues (2016)
Volume 7: 4 Issues (2015)
Volume 6: 4 Issues (2014)
Volume 5: 4 Issues (2013)
Volume 4: 4 Issues (2012)
Volume 3: 4 Issues (2011)
Volume 2: 4 Issues (2010)
Volume 1: 4 Issues (2009)
View Complete Journal Contents Listing