Unsteady Numerical and Experimental Study of Cavitation in Axial Pump

Unsteady Numerical and Experimental Study of Cavitation in Axial Pump

Mohamed Adel, Nabil H. Mostafa
DOI: 10.4018/ijmmme.2014010104
OnDemand:
(Individual Articles)
Available
$37.50
No Current Special Offers
TOTAL SAVINGS: $37.50

Abstract

This paper presents an experimental and three-dimensional numerical study of unsteady, turbulent, void growth and cavitation simulation inside the passage of the axial flow pump. In this study a 3D Navier-Stokes code was used (CFDRC, 2008) to model the two-phase flow field around a four blades axial pump. The governing equations are discretized on a structured grid using an upwind difference scheme. The numerical simulation used the standard K-e turbulence model to account for the turbulence effect. The numerical simulation of void growth and cavitation in an axial pump was studied under unsteady calculating. Pressure distribution and vapor volume fraction were completed versus time at different condition. The computational code has been validated by comparing the predicated numerical results with the experiment. The predicted of cavitation growth and distribution on the impeller blade also agreed with that visualized of high speed camera.
Article Preview
Top

Previous Works

A limited number of studies tried to simulate the cavitation in axial pumps. An energy model was used to predict the cavitation erosion in centrifugal pumps, but it predicts the hydrodynamic aspect of cavitaion (Mostafa, et al., 1990).

Fukaya, et al. (2003) predicted the cavitation performance of an axial pump, but the model used does not include a turbulence model.

Okita et al. (2003) simulated the unsteady cavitating flow in a pump inducer. They used a numerical method for incompressible fluid flow, but it has been employed the compressibility through the low Mach number as an assumption.

Mostafa and Boraey, (2006) made an Experimental and numerical study of the two-phase flow field around a four blades axial pump based on steady conditions as an assumption.

Sedlář et al. (2008) made Analysis of Cavitation Phenomena in Water and its Application to Prediction of Cavitation Erosion in Hydraulic Machinery. This article also shortly described the experimental research of the cavitating flow aimed at the validation of the erosion potential model, development of the nuclei-content measurement and the validation of the bubble nucleation model

Yang et al. (2009) made a numerical simulation of air-water Bubbly flow in axial flow pump Impeller. The numerical results demonstrate that air bubbles accumulate at the blade back near the impeller inlet because the lowest pressure on blade back happens

De-sheng et al. (2010) investigated numerically and experimentally the unsteady flow of axial pump. This study focused on the comparison between the steady and unsteady results and not concerned with the cavitation phenomenon.

Tabar and Poursharifi, (2011) made pure experimental work to study the tip vortex caviation inception in an axial flow pump. The pump characteristic curves were obtained. The cavitation phenomenon was observed with a camera and a stroboscope.

Mostafa and Adel, (2012) presented unsteady numerical simulation and void growth inside the passage of axial turbine. The results was compared with the previous studies and showed good agreement.

The main objective of this study is to simulate the unsteady 3-D Navier-Stokes equations, behavior of a cavitating axial pump with special interest in the cavity geometry, the pressure and void fraction fields. Also, it includes the effects of turbulence and fluid viscosity. The cavity shape will be determined over the blades and the 3-D flow field around the cavitating propeller. Also the performance curve of the pump will be obtained experimentally.

Complete Article List

Search this Journal:
Reset
Volume 13: 1 Issue (2024)
Volume 12: 4 Issues (2022): 1 Released, 3 Forthcoming
Volume 11: 4 Issues (2021)
Volume 10: 4 Issues (2020)
Volume 9: 4 Issues (2019)
Volume 8: 4 Issues (2018)
Volume 7: 4 Issues (2017)
Volume 6: 4 Issues (2016)
Volume 5: 4 Issues (2015)
Volume 4: 4 Issues (2014)
Volume 3: 4 Issues (2013)
Volume 2: 4 Issues (2012)
Volume 1: 4 Issues (2011)
View Complete Journal Contents Listing