Academic Integrity and the Inclusion of East Asian International Students in Canadian Higher Education

Academic Integrity and the Inclusion of East Asian International Students in Canadian Higher Education

Phoebe Eunkyung Kang
DOI: 10.4018/978-1-7998-8921-2.ch010
OnDemand:
(Individual Chapters)
Available
$37.50
No Current Special Offers
TOTAL SAVINGS: $37.50

Abstract

This chapter discusses academic integrity issues affecting East Asian international students in Canadian higher education contexts and further highlights the importance of addressing academic integrity issues to improve the inclusion of East Asian international students. The student body has shifted with the increasing number of international students in Canadian higher education contexts and the number of East Asian international students plays a significant role with the shift. East Asian international students bring in their unique cultural backgrounds to the teaching and learning environments in the Canadian higher education landscape. This chapter draws on the autoethnographic approach to discuss the persistence of the academic integrity issues East Asian international students have been facing. The chapter further makes practical and future research recommendations from a transnational educator's perspective.
Chapter Preview

Every educational institution in Canada, and across the world, experiences issues with academic integrity (McKenzie, 2018, p.40)

Top

Autoethnography As Theoretical Framework And Method

This chapter utilizes autoethnography as both theoretical framework and method. Autoethnography is “a highly personal process” yet “it carefully examines how the researcher interacted with other people within their socio-cultural contexts and how social forces have influenced their lived experiences” (Chang, 2013, p.107). Spry (2001) states that autoethnography is “a self-narrative that critiques the situatedness of self with others in social, political, economic and cultural context” (p.710). Jones (2005) states that “autoethnography involves setting a scene, telling a story, weaving intricate connections among life and art, experience and theory, evocation and explanation … hoping for readers who will bring the same careful attention to our words in the context of their own lives” (p.765). While there are various understandings of autoethnography as a theoretical and/or a methodological framework, Chang (2013) summarizes some of the common characteristics of autoethnography as follows:

  • “Autoethnography uses the researcher’s personal experiences as primary data;

  • Autoethnography intends to expand the understanding of social phenomena;

  • Autoethnography processes can vary and result in different writing products.” (p.108)

Complete Chapter List

Search this Book:
Reset